P1032Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing hemodaialysis

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Although radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has become a standard therapy, the ablation outcomes in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) has not been fully elucidated. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of RFCA for AF in patients undergoing HD. Methods Twenty-three patients undergoing HD (17 men, age 65±8 years, 19 paroxysmal AF) who underwent RFCA for drug-refractory AF in two institutes were enrolled in the study and defined as HD group. The clinical parameters, recurrence free rate and frequency of periprocedural complications were compared to 46 randomly selected age, gender and left atrial diameter matched controls not requiring HD defined as non-HD group (34men, age 67±7 years, 38 paroxysmal AF). Results The patients in HD group had a significantly lower body mass index (21±3 vs. 25±3 P<0.01), higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (30% vs. 10% P=0.04), and higher prevalence of congestive heart failure (52% vs. 10% P<0.01) compared to patients in non-HD group. Echocardiography indicated lower left ventricular ejection fraction (57±17% vs. 65±9% P=0.02), higher E/e' (20±8 vs. 12±4 P<0.01), higher tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient (30mmHg vs. 24mmHg P<0.01) and more impaired left ventricular diastolic function in HD group. All the subjects underwent bilateral pulmonary vein isolation plus additional linear lesion. The number of ablation procedure was similar between the two groups (1.43±0.5 vs. 1.46±0.6 P=0.88). During the follow-up period of 37±25 months after the last procedure, the arrhythmia free rate was similar between the two groups (86% vs. 84% log-rank P=0.82). Vascular access complication occurred in two patients in HD group, and pericardial effusion occurred in one patient in non-HD group, while no life-threatening complications were observed in either group. Cardiogenic cerebral infarction occurred in one patient in non-HD group. Discontinuation of oral anticoagulation after the ablation was more often seen in the HD group compared to non-HD group (91% vs. 60% P<0.01). Conclusions Although patients undergoing HD had more impaired left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, RFCA for AF in patients with HD was shown to be as effective and safe as in non-HD patients. RFCA may be an efficient approach to manage AF in patients undergoing HD.