P101 THE IMPACT OF PARATRACHEAL LYMPHADENECTOMY ON LYMPH NODE YIELD AND SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES IN ESOPHAGECTOMY: A NATIONAL PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS

Abstract

Abstract Aim This study aimed to investigate the impact of paratracheal lymphadenectomy on lymph node yield and short-term outcomes in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. Background & Methods Although the addition of paratracheal lymphadenectomy to a standard two-field lymphadenectomy possibly may provide survival benefits for patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, the required dissection along the recurrent laryngeal nerves might be associated with increased morbidity. To investigate the impact of paratracheal lymphadenectomy on short-term oncological outcomes and postoperative complications, this nation-wide population-based cohort study included esophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by elective transthoracic esophagectomy with at least subcarinal and para-esophageal lymphadenectomy from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA). After propensity score matching Ivor Lewis and McKeown approaches separately, the lymph node yield and clinical outcomes were compared between patients who underwent paratracheal lymphadenectomy versus patients who did not. Results Between 2011-2017, a total of 2128 patients were included. A total of 770 patients (n=385 vs. n=385) and 516 patients (n=258 vs. n=258) were matched for the Ivor Lewis and McKeown approaches, respectively. Paratracheal lymphadenectomy was associated with a higher total lymph node yield in both Ivor Lewis (23 vs. 19 nodes, P<0.001) and McKeown (21 vs. 19 nodes, P=0.015) esophagectomy. In McKeown esophagectomy, paratracheal lymphadenectomy was associated with significantly more advanced pathological nodal staging (pN0; 57% vs. 69%, pN1; 25% vs. 16%, pN2; 12% vs. 11%, pN3; 6% vs. 3%, P=0.006). No significant differences were observed regarding recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, other postoperative complications, and mortality, although a higher re-intervention rate was found after paratracheal lymphadenectomy during McKeown esophagectomy (30% vs. 18%, P=0.002) In patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, paratracheal lymphadenectomy was associated with increased length of stay (12 vs. 11 days, P<0.048). Conclusion In patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer, the addition of paratracheal lymphadenectomy results in a higher lymph node yield with comparable complication and mortality rates.