P086 MFI, MFI everywhere: Is there a clinically applicable MFI cutpoint anywhere?

Abstract

Aim Luminex Single Antigen bead assays (LSAB) are robust for detecting and identifying IgG anti-HLA antibodies, and the LSAB mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) is currently used to list unacceptable antigens and to predict physical crossmatch (XM) results. Concerns exist regarding the use of MFI as the criterion because MFI thresholds for accurately predicting physical XM results are far from established. We aimed to address this unmet need. Methods We leveraged the XM results from ASHI Proficiency Testing (PTs) to investigate whether LSAB MFI cutpoints are predictive of physical XM results. ASHI graded (⩾80% consensus) XM results from 8 consecutive ASHI PTs in which up to 30 labs tested 40 sera and 16 cells distributed by ASHI were used to examine whether LSAB MFI data we generated in the same PTs predict physical XM results. Cumulative MFIs of DSA directed at HLA-A, B, and C were tested for their ability to predict T cell Flow XM and T cell AHG XM results; cumulative MFIs of DSA directed at HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/4/5, DQB and DP were tested for their ability to predict B cell Flow XM and B cell CDC XM results. Results Our data analysis identified that cumulative MFI of DSA less than 6000 directed at HLA-class I antigens predicted T cell Flow XM results with a 100% negative predictive value (NPV) and MFI > 7000 predicted T cell Flow XM results with a 100% positive predictive value (PPV) (Chi-Square for trend, X 2 = 70, df = 1, P 8000 predicted B Flow XM result with a 100% PPV (X 2 ; =; 67, df = 1, P Download high-res image (343KB) Download full-size image Conclusions Our data demonstrating the feasibility of developing LSAB MFI cutpoints for the accurate prediction of T cell Flow XM, B cell Flow XM, T cell AHG XM, and B cell CDC XM results advance a strategy for the interpretation of virtual crossmatches and the prediction of physical XM results.