Abstract
Abstract Aim “Can a mesh reduce failure rates after closure of a hernia defect?” Material and Methods “Porcine abdominal walls and bovine flanks were used as model tissues. After preparation, a 15 cm long incision was placed in the linea alba of the porcine abdominal wall. An additional round 5 cm defect was punched in the middle of the incision. The bovine flank was prepared in a similar manner. The incisions with the defects were closed with running sutures in a small stitch, small bite technique. Monomax® 2-0 sutures were used with suture to wound lengths above 4:1. Dynamesh® CiCAT meshes of three different sizes were placed in the sublay position. The mesh-tissue compounds were investigated on our self-built hydraulic bench test simulating coughs. Dynamic intermitted strain (DIS) was repeatedly delivered with impacts around 210 mmHg. Each of ten preparation was loaded 425 times by the pressure peaks.” Results “Small stitch, small bite sutures using 2-0 Monomax® with a suture-incision-ratio of 4.5:1 can provide a durable defect closure. Under other conditions, suture lines can reopen. A mesh reduces the recurrence of incisional hernia depending on the mesh size.” Conclusions “An additional DIS-class A mesh in sublay position can provide sufficient support for a suture closing the defect of the abdominal wall. It can prevent a tear-out of the suture from the tissue. On average, a mesh-augmented defect closure reduces the recurrence rate of incisional hernia.”
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have