Abstract

Abstract Aim Incisional hernia remains one of the most frequent complications after abdominal surgery. Several closure techniques exist. However, fundamental biomechanical understanding of these techniques and of the differences in clinical outcomes are still lacking. It is thought that distribution of lateral forces on the midline plays a role. Testing in a clinical setting is limited by sample sizes, costs and ethical regulations. We propose a preclinical ex vivo model in which multiple closure configurations can be tested in a controlled setting, eliminating interfering variables existing in previously published, more complex abdominal wall models. Consequently, this allows a valid comparison between closure modalities based on biomechanical merits. Material and Methods The experimental set-up is represented by a vertical tensile load tester, in which a sutured tissue sample is clamped. The tissue samples are covered with a fine, random speckle pattern via miniscule ink droplets. A high-resolution camera captures the speckles as the tissue is subjected to linear pulling forces. Image analysis documenting relative movement of speckles as a means for measuring tissue deformation is performed in ex-vivo tissue samples, resulting in specific objective biomechanical characteristics for each closure configuration. Results Local tissue strain fields are visualized, and compared between closure modalities and correlated to known linear forces applied to the tissue. The latest results will be shared and discussed. Conclusions A new modality for biomechanical evaluation of closure techniques has been developed. Further validation and serial experiments with different closure modalities with and without mesh reinforcement can be performed in order to determine the biomechanically optimal suture-technique for fascial closure.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call