Abstract
ObjectiveTo test the psychometric properties of the Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC), refine the toolkit and compare results with service user experiences.MethodsFollowing the initial development of the toolkit, it was translated into the languages of the partner countries and piloted. It was then refined to maximize a) its inter-rater reliability, b) its usability and c) its ability to deliver assessments relevant to each country's established systems of change at local, regional and national level. Managers of participating units were re-interviewed using the refined tool. QuIRC scores were compared against service users’ quality of life, autonomy, experiences of care and markers of recovery to assess whether the QuIRc could provide a proxy-assessment of the unit's promotion of service users’ autonomy and Recovery.ResultsThe tool was piloted in 20 units in each country (a total of 200 units). Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intra-class correlations and Cohen's Kappa coefficients. Factors with low reliability or extreme response biases were dropped. Remaining items were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis to test domain allocation and improve internal consistency. QuIRC domain ratings were compared by country and facility type and with service user assessments. The QuIRC was found to have high reliability, to be easy to use and there was high correlation between domain ratings and service users’ ratings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.