P010 FIRST SURVEILLANCE COLONOSCOPY FOR INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE – ARE WE GETTING IT RIGHT FROM THE START?

Abstract

Abstract Background Surveillance for colorectal cancer (CRC) is necessary in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have a similar CRC risk to those with Crohn’s colitis (CC). British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines from 2010 outlined recommendations for screening including surveillance intervals and pancolonic dye spraying with targeted biopsies. We aimed to identify reasons why the first surveillance colonoscopy is not being performed as advised, including the role of poor bowel preparation and disease activity. Methods Retrospective study of all IBD colonoscopies over a 7 year period (2011–2018) across two sites at a tertiary London based hospital trust. 214 patients were identified and exclusion criterion was applied (not first surveillance/diagnosis prior to year 2000/PSC/inadequate data). 93 patients were included for analysis. Results 26 (28.0%) surveillance colonoscopies were performed prior to 10 years of diagnosis (ie. before BSG guideline recommendation). 22 (23.7%) surveillance colonoscopies performed after the recommended interval. Dye spray was performed in only 2 patients (2%). Reasons cited for not dying were only given in 4 (4.3%) cases, and included poor bowel prep or active disease. No reason was given in 87 (93%) cases. Targeted biopsies were performed in 24 (25.8%) patients, with random biopsies in 56 (60.2%) patients. Conclusion The first IBD surveillance colonoscopy is only being performed at the correct time interval in approximately 50% of cases with over a quarter being performed too soon and almost a quarter being performed too late. Pan-colonic dye spray is used in only 2% and targeted biopsies are taken in only 1 in 4 patients. Poor bowel preparation and disease activity do not appear to be limiting factors in the use of dye spray. We conclude that appropriate initial colitis surveillance is not being performed in the majority despite published guidelines. Organisational factors such as sufficient time allocated to dye spray colonoscopy, along with endoscopist skill, may be contributing factors.