P-346 First comparison of the egg freezing and storage cost between medical adaptation and social adaptation of Japan fertility hospitals and clinics based on institution's websites

Abstract

Abstract Study question In Japan, how much of freezing cost and the yearly storage cost of medical and social egg freezing for fertility preservation is clearly disclosed on the institution's website? Summary answer Of the 621 infertility treatment institutions, 146 listed egg freezing on their websites, 46 specified the freezing cost, and 71 specified the yearly storage cost. What is known already In Japan, from April 2022, standard assisted reproductive technology will be covered by insurance, but medical and social egg freezing will continue to be privately funded. Therefore, it is unclear how many facilities in Japan perform egg freezing. Furthermore, while the cost of freezing and yearly storage varies significantly from facility to facility, there has been no data comparing egg freezing among facilities in Japan or other countries. Therefore, we extracted data about freezing and storage cost from each institution's website and compared them for the first time. Study design, size, duration This study is a web-based survey in which a single board-certified specialist by Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine exhaustively browsed the websites of all 621 fertility treatment institutions in Japan in October 2021 and analyzed the implementation of egg freezing, freezing costs, and yearly storage costs of egg are clearly stated on the websites. The costs of drugs used for egg retrieval and ovarian stimulation were excluded. Participants/materials, setting, methods Of the 621 institutions, 88 institutions that clearly stated on their websites that they offer egg freezing for medical reasons were divided into a medical group, and 58 institutions that clearly stated that they offer egg freezing for only social reasons were divided into social group for statistical analysis. We compared the freezing and the yearly storage cost, respectively, whether it varies depending on the number of eggs or whether it is a fixed cost. Main results and the role of chance Of the 621 institutions, 146 (23.5%), 88 in the medical group and 58 in the social group, specified that they offer egg freezing. The percentages of clarification for freezing cost and yearly storage cost on the website were 27.3% and 30.7% in the medical group, 72.4%, and 75.9% in the social group, so the social group was higher in both cases (p < 0.01). The percentage of fixed costs for egg freezing was significantly lower in the social group (6/42, 14.3%) than in the medical group (9/24, 37.5%) (p < 0.05). The percentage of fixed costs for yearly storage cost was samely significantly lower in the social group (30/44, 68.2%) than in the medical group (25/27, 92.6%) (p < 0.05). The mean freezing cost/yearly storage cost was as follows for 1, 5, and 10 eggs. The medical group was (JPY45,527/JPY22,327, JPY65,179/JPY22,530, JPY90,311/JPY22,770), and the social group was (JPY56,822/JPY40,178, JPY88,429/JPY56,502, JPY136,550/JPY79,090), so the social group had the significantly highest amount of costs in each case. Note that JPY 10,000 is about EUR77.7. The most expensive clinic to store ten eggs was JPY500,000 (EUR3,883) per year, and the least university hospital was JPY 4,600 (EUR35.7) per year. Limitations, reasons for caution This survey was conducted by carefully browsing the facility's website, but since we did not confirm the information through questionnaires or e-mail, there is the possibility that the information may have been updated. Another limitation is that less than half of the medical groups list cost details on their websites. Wider implications of the findings This is the first report to analyze the cost of egg freezing in Japan using the institution's website. The rate of cost disclosure on the website is still low. Moreover, the costs of social freezing are significantly higher than medical reasons, but this may change with the insurance of ART. Trial registration number not applicable