P-297 Intensive luteal phase support regimens for endometriosis and adenomyosis patients in hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer cycles – subcutaneous or intramuscular progesterone treatment?

Abstract

Abstract Study question Does subcutaneous (SC) progesterone treatment provide progesterone levels comparable to intramuscular (IM) progesterone when using a cut-off level of 118nmol/l(37.1ng/ml) during intensive luteal phase support? Summary answer As part of an intensive luteal phase support regimen SC progesterone provides higher P4 levels compared to the use of IM progesterone. What is known already Low serum progesterone (P4) levels in HRT-FET cycles negatively impact reproductive outcomes. This effect is particularly pronounced in patients with endometriosis and adenomyosis, due to reduced progesterone actions and progesterone resistance at the receptor level. Therefore, higher serum P4 levels are required to maintain an optimal reproductive outcome during HRT-FET. A P4 cut-off of 118nmol/l (37.1ng/ml) or above has been suggested, a level four times higher than that of the non-endometriosis patient. To achieve high P4 levels, intensive luteal phase support (LPS) regimen has been suggested. This includes vaginal progesterone administration and additional treatment via IM, SC or rectal administration. Study design, size, duration This cohort study includes 380 HRT-FET cycles in endometriosis/adenomyosis patients. Patients were treated from January 2016 until August 2019 with one type of intensive LPS regimen (n = 262) and from January 2000 to January 2023 with two different LPS regimens depending on whether serum P4 levels were lower or higher than 118nmol/l on the day of blastocyst transfer (BT) (n = 118). P4 was measured in a standardised manner. Participants/materials, setting, methods Patients received treatment in a public university affiliated fertility clinic. Endometrial priming involved the use of estradiol followed by vaginal progesterone. From the fourth day of progesterone, one of the following intensive LPS regimens were added: A) 50mg IM progesterone, B) 25mg SC progesterone BD, or C) 25mg SC progesterone BD plus 400mg rectal rescue progesterone BD if P4<118nmol/l. Blastocyst transfer (BT) and P4 measurement were performed on the sixth day of progesterone administration. Main results and the role of chance The overall pregnancy rate, live birth rate (LBR) and total pregnancy loss rates for the whole cohort were 63%, 41% and 36%, respectively. For the three groups A, B and C the mean serum P4 levels on the day of BT were 103.1 ±44.4nmol/l, 170.5 ±62.9nmol/l and 90.1 ±21.5nmol/l. In Group A (IM) 67% of patients (176/262) had P4 levels <118 nmol/l whereas only 36% (43/118; p < 0.001) had P4 <118 nmol/l in the groups of patients treated with SC progesterone (Group B and C). The unadjusted LBR was not significantly different between groups, 39%, 39%, 51%, (p = 0.32). However, a sub-group analysis showed that comparing patients with serum P4 levels <118nmol/l on the BT day in Group A with patients with P4 levels <118nmol/l in Group C a significantly higher LBR was found if intensive LPS included both SC and rectally administered progesterone compared to IM progesterone, only: 51% (44/86) vs 34% (59/176), p = 0.03. The adjusted odds ratio for live birth was 2.04 (95% CI [1.00, 4.16], p = 0.05) after adjusting for age, vitrification day 5 or 6, blastocyst quality and numbers of blastocysts transferred, if intensive LPS included SC and rectal rescue compared to IM, only in patients with P4 levels <118nmol/l. Limitations, reasons for caution This cohort study was conducted over two different time periods. Single embryo transfer was performed only during the later period. The bio-pharmacological profiles of SC and IM progesterone differ, which can influence serum P4 levels. However, in the present study, all blood samples were collected in a standardised manner. Wider implications of the findings This study is the first to report reproductive outcomes following different intensive LPS regimens in a cohort of endometriosis/adenomyosis patients. To increase reproductive outcomes, individualisation of the HRT-FET cycle may be beneficial and, importantly, rectal progesterone administration can be used as a rescue regimen in addition to SC progesterone. Trial registration number Due to the retrospective study design no ethical approval was needed.