P-009 Impact of sperm preparation methods on embryo development rate and embryo ploidy status: ICSI egg donation as a model

Abstract

Abstract Study question Do different sperm separation techniques result in distinguishable contributions to embryo development rates and ploidy status? Summary answer CA0 sperm separation device, devoid of centrifugation, yielded a higher euploidy rate than conventional swim-up (50% vs. 74%, p = 0.02), notably observed in abnormozoospermic cases. What is known already Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) emerges as a key paternal risk factor associated with embryo aneuploidy, increasing the risk of ART failures. Factors like advanced male age, prolonged ejaculatory abstinence, and the detrimental effects of centrifugation during sperm separation jeopardize sperm DNA integrity. A recent centrifugation-free sperm separation device (CA0), employing live sperm sorting technology, exhibits efficiency in producing highly motile sperm with minimized SDF. This retrospective cohort study solely focusing on ICSI egg donation cycles to assess the influence of sperm separation methods (conventional swim-up vs. CA0) on early embryo development, and embryo ploidy. Study design, size, duration This retrospective study included 83 couples who underwent ICSI egg donation cycles at Chachava Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia. Thirty-three semen specimens were processed using conventional swim-up (SU) and 427 Mii were inseminated. Forty-four semen samples were separated by CA0 and 519 Mii were inseminated. Clinical outcome measures included fertilization rate (number of 2PN over number of inseminated oocyte), good embryo rate (embryo number with more than 8 cells over inseminated oocyte), and euploidy rate using PGT-A. Participants/materials, setting, methods Male age and basic semen parameters via CASA (CEROS II, Hamilton-Thorne) were recorded. SU involved layering 1 mL neat semen to 1.2 mL HTF medium, inclining the tube at 45° for 60 min at 37 °C, collecting 1 mL uppermost, adding 2 mL HTF for centrifugation at 500×g for 5 min, and resuspending sperm pellet with 0.5 mL HTF. Semen samples were sorted using LensHooke® CA0 device following the manufacturer’s instructions. Main results and the role of chance In comparing demographic characteristics between SU and CA0 arms, CA0 exhibited higher median total motility (SU: 40% vs. CA0: 54%, p = 0.02), with no significant differences in female age and Mii oocyte count. This study assessed the impact of sperm separation methods on early embryo development, finding no significant differences in fertilization rate (SU: 79% vs. CA0: 77%) and good embryo rate (SU: 64% vs. CA0: 62%). However, CA0 demonstrated a significantly higher euploidy rate than SU (SU: 59% vs. CA0: 69%, p = 0.03). Further analysis within subpopulations, including normozoospermic and asthenozoospermic (total motility <40%), revealed equivalent euploidy rates between SU and CA0 for normospermic specimens (SU: 66% vs. CA0: 68%). However, a significant differentiation in euploidy rate emerged for asthenozoospermic cases (SU: 59% vs. CA0: 74%, p = 0.02). Specifically, comparing outcomes in normozoospermic, a significant reduction was observed in asthenozoospermic cases using SU (66% vs. 50%, p = 0.02), whereas CA0 provided improved euploidy rates regardless of semen quality (68% for normozoospermic and 74% for asthenozoospermic). In conclusion, this study suggests that the non-invasive live sperm sorting device enhances embryo euploidy rates, serving as a reliable sperm preparation method, ensuring selection consistency despite sample variations. Limitations, reasons for caution This study’s limitations include its retrospective nature and single-center trial design. To more effectively assess CA0 efficiency, a randomized controlled trial targeting diverse patient eligibility criteria is warranted. Wider implications of the findings Attributed to the improved embryo euploidy with CA0, we anticipate enhanced ART outcomes, such as increased embryo transfer rate and prevention of ART failures related to embryo aneuploidy. Additionally, CA0 offers practical benefits by streamlining and standardizing the sperm separation process with only three steps involved. Trial registration number not applicable