Abstract

Introduction of high-performing crop cultivars and crop/soil water management practices that increase the stomatal uptake of carbon dioxide and photosynthesis will be instrumental in realizing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of achieving food security. To date, however, global assessments of how to increase crop yield have failed to consider the negative effects of tropospheric ozone, a gaseous pollutant that enters the leaf stomatal pores of plants along with carbon dioxide, and is increasing in concentration globally, particularly in rapidly developing countries. Earlier studies have simply estimated that the largest effects are in the areas with the highest ozone concentrations. Using a modelling method that accounts for the effects of soil moisture deficit and meteorological factors on the stomatal uptake of ozone, we show for the first time that ozone impacts on wheat yield are particularly large in humid rain-fed and irrigated areas of major wheat-producing countries (e.g. United States, France, India, China and Russia). Averaged over 2010-2012, we estimate that ozone reduces wheat yields by a mean 9.9% in the northern hemisphere and 6.2% in the southern hemisphere, corresponding to some 85Tg (million tonnes) of lost grain. Total production losses in developing countries receiving Official Development Assistance are 50% higher than those in developed countries, potentially reducing the possibility of achieving UN SDG2. Crucially, our analysis shows that ozone could reduce the potential yield benefits of increasing irrigation usage in response to climate change because added irrigation increases the uptake and subsequent negative effects of the pollutant. We show that mitigation of air pollution in a changing climate could play a vital role in achieving the above-mentioned UN SDG, while also contributing to other SDGs related to human health and well-being, ecosystems and climate change.

Highlights

  • Tropospheric concentrations of ozone, a photochemically produced secondary pollutant for which the precursors include oxides of nitrogen, volatile organic compounds and carbon monoxide (Simpson, Arneth, Mills, Solberg, & Uddling, 2014), are already high in many crop-growing areas of the world, e.g. in North America, Europe, and South and East Asia (Cooper et al, 2014; Mills et al, 2018; Wild et al, 2012)

  • By modelling the stomatal uptake of ozone on a global scale, our results estimate that the current global wheat yield penalty from ozone pollution is a mean of 9.4% for 2010–2012

  • This study compared the effects of ozone in developed countries (DC) that export 42% of their wheat grain with effects in countries receiving Official Development Assistance (ODA) that rely largely on home-grown wheat, exporting only 0.7%, 0.4%, 6.0% and 8.9% of production for Least Developed Countries (LDC), Other Low Income Countries (OLIC), Lower Middle Income Countries and Territories (LMIC) and Upper Middle Income Countries and Territories (UMIC) respectively (Mean of 2010–2012, FAOSTAT)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Tropospheric (or ground-level) concentrations of ozone, a photochemically produced secondary pollutant for which the precursors include oxides of nitrogen, volatile organic compounds and carbon monoxide (Simpson, Arneth, Mills, Solberg, & Uddling, 2014), are already high in many crop-growing areas of the world, e.g. in North America, Europe, and South and East Asia (Cooper et al, 2014; Mills et al, 2018; Wild et al, 2012). In the same meta-analysis, relative grain yield loss increased linearly as ozone concentration increased, with the highest losses being in the 20%– 30% range for some sites in India, China and the United States (calculated from supplementary data in Pleijel et al, 2018) Despite such compelling field evidence of the negative effects of ozone on crop yields, most statistical and process-based modelling of future crop yields are not yet including the impacts of current or predicted future ozone pollution (Challinor, Ewert, Arnold, Simelton, & Fraser, 2009; Emberson et al, 2018; Lobell & Asseng, 2017; Lobell & Gourdji, 2012). We have used an empirical approach to test these hypotheses, involving spatial modelling of the cumulative stomatal uptake of ozone and concentration-based metrics for crop relevant time periods and application of dose–response relationships derived from field-based experiments to determine the extent of effect on yield per 1° 9 1° grid square

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| RESULTS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call