Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine clinician opinion regarding oxygen management in moderate-late preterm resuscitation. An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed through email/social messaging platforms to neonatologists in 21 countries (October 2020-March 2021) via REDCap. Of the 695 respondents, 69% had access to oxygen blenders and 90% had pulse oximeters. Respondents from high-income countries were more likely to have oxygen blenders than those from middle-income countries (72% vs. 66%). Most initiated respiratory support with FiO2 0.21 (43%) or 0.3 (36%) but only 45% titrated FiO2 to target SpO2 . Most (89%) considered heart rate as a more important indicator of response than SpO2 . Almost all (96%) supported the need for well-designed trials to examine oxygenation in moderate-late preterm resuscitation. Most clinicians resuscitated moderate-late preterm infants with lower initial FiO2 but some cannot/will not target SpO2 or titrate FiO2 . Most consider heart rate as a more important indicator of infant response than SpO2 .Large and robust clinical trials examining oxygen use for moderate-late preterm resuscitation, including long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, are supported amongst clinicians.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.