Abstract

Introduction: Tumor hypoxia confers both a poor prognosis and increased resistance to oncologic therapies, and therefore, hypoxia modification with reliable oxygen profiling during anticancer treatment is desirable. The OxyChip is an implantable oxygen sensor that can detect tumor oxygen levels using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry. We report initial safety and feasibility outcomes after OxyChip implantation in a first-in-humans clinical trial (NCT02706197, www.clinicaltrials.gov).Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Eligible patients had a tumor ≤ 3 cm from the skin surface with planned surgical resection as part of standard-of-care therapy. Most patients had a squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (33%) or a breast malignancy (33%). After an initial cohort of six patients who received surgery alone, eligibility was expanded to patients receiving either chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgical resection. The OxyChip was implanted into the tumor using an 18-G needle; a subset of patients had ultrasound-guided implantation. Electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry was carried out using a custom-built clinical EPR scanner. Patients were evaluated for associated toxicity using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE); evaluations started immediately after OxyChip placement, occurred during every EPR oximetry measurement, and continued periodically after removal. The OxyChip was removed during standard-of-care surgery, and pathologic analysis of the tissue surrounding the OxyChip was performed.Results: Eighteen patients received surgery alone, while five underwent chemotherapy and one underwent radiotherapy prior to surgery. No unanticipated serious adverse device events occurred. The maximum severity of any adverse event as graded by the CTCAE was 1 (least severe), and all were related to events typically associated with implantation. After surgical resection, 45% of the patients had no histopathologic findings specifically associated with the OxyChip. All tissue pathology was “anticipated” excepting a patient with greater than expected inflammatory findings, which was assessed to be related to the tumor as opposed to the OxyChip.Conclusion: This report of the first-in-humans trial of OxyChip implantation and EPR oximetry demonstrated no significant clinical pathology or unanticipated serious adverse device events. Use of the OxyChip in the clinic was thus safe and feasible.

Highlights

  • Tumor hypoxia confers both a poor prognosis and increased resistance to oncologic therapies, and hypoxia modification with reliable oxygen profiling during anticancer treatment is desirable

  • We report initial data from a first-in-humans trial on the feasibility of OxyChip implantation and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry, clinical adverse events associated with OxyChip implantation, and the histopathology associated with the presence of the OxyChip in human tissues

  • All patients were enrolled in the clinical trial NCT02706197: Oxygen Measurements in Subcutaneous Tumors by EPR Oximetry Using OxyChip

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tumor hypoxia confers both a poor prognosis and increased resistance to oncologic therapies, and hypoxia modification with reliable oxygen profiling during anticancer treatment is desirable. Tumor hypoxia is associated with a poor prognosis as well as increased resistance to oncologic therapies, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy, in many malignancies [1,2,3,4,5]. Routine hypoxia modification in the clinic has generally not been adopted as standard of care In part, this is due to the failure to demonstrate an overall survival benefit in modern Phase III trials; it has been suggested that this outcome is related to an inability to appropriately select patients for targeted hypoxia interventions [7]. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry has the potential to address these needs by facilitating appropriate patient selection prior to oxygen modification, providing real-time feedback as to the success of oxygen modification, and functioning seamlessly within the clinical workflow

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call