Abstract

Oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) is a process to directly convert methane into ethylene. However, its ethylene yield is limited in conventional reactors by the nature of the reaction system. In this work, the integration of different membranes to increase the overall performance of the large-scale oxidative coupling of methane process has been investigated from a techno-economic point of view. A 1D membrane reactor model has been developed, and the results show that the OCM reactor yield is significantly improved when integrating either porous or dense membranes in packed bed reactors. These higher yields have a positive impact on the economics and performance of the downstream separation, resulting in a cost of ethylene production of 595–625 €/tonC2H4 depending on the type of membranes employed, 25–30% lower than the benchmark technology based on oil as feedstock (naphtha steam cracking). Despite the use of a cryogenic separation unit, the porous membranes configuration shows generally better results than dense ones because of the much larger membrane area required in the dense membranes case. In addition, the CO2 emissions of the OCM studied processes are also much lower than the benchmark technology (total CO2 emissions are reduced by 96% in the dense membranes case and by 88% in the porous membranes case, with respect to naphtha steam cracking), where the high direct CO2 emissions have a major impact on the process. However, the scalability and the issues associated with it seem to be the main constraints to the industrial application of the process, since experimental studies of these membrane reactor technologies have been carried out just on a very small scale.

Highlights

  • The oxidative coupling of methane process (OCM), which aims to substitute the conventional ethylene production technologies, has been widely studied by the scientific community since the 800 s [1]

  • Technology can compete with the naphtha steam cracking only if a 25–30% reactor yield is reached. This is possible by improving the catalysts reactivity as well as by developing intensified reactor configurations. As it would be with a membrane reactor, the chances of competing with the conventional ethylene production technologies would be significantly increased because at higher conversion and selectivity, as it is theoretically to occur with this configuration [6], the necessity of importing electricity, shown as one of the main constrains of the conventional OCM [12], is expected to be reduced due to the easier separation train of the process which is carried out at cryogenic conditions

  • In the first of these two options, which integrates dense oxygen selective membranes, the O2 -N2 separation is carried out in-situ in the reactor, avoiding the utilization of the energy intensive air separation unit to purify O2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The oxidative coupling of methane process (OCM), which aims to substitute (at least partially) the conventional ethylene production technologies, has been widely studied by the scientific community since the 800 s [1]. The results of that work indicate that nowadays the cost of ethylene produced from OCM technology can compete with the naphtha steam cracking only if a 25–30% reactor yield is reached This is possible by improving the catalysts reactivity as well as by developing intensified reactor configurations. In the latter case, as it would be with a membrane reactor, the chances of competing with the conventional ethylene production technologies would be significantly increased because at higher conversion and selectivity, as it is theoretically to occur with this configuration [6], the necessity of importing electricity, shown as one of the main constrains of the conventional OCM [12], is expected to be reduced due to the easier separation train of the process which is carried out at cryogenic conditions. The main conclusions of this work, as well as the potential improvements for the OCM technology, will be given

Methodology
Model Description
Dense membrane reactor reactor OCM
Porous Membrane Reactor OCM Process Scheme
Results
Membrane Reactor OCM Process Scheme
Sensitivity on Membrane Costs
Comparison of Different Reactor Configurations
Ethylene Price
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.