Abstract
In his highly insightful and wide-ranging rebuttal article “Doing Phenomenology on the Things,” van Manen makes the important claim that “the mission of modern phenomenology transcends foundational and exegetical philosophical theorizing” (2019, p. 3). I take this claim seriously and put forward this article as an exercise in practical lifeworld phenomenological reflection. By lifeworld I refer to the environing world in which we are enmeshed and in which we live and breathe and have our being; it penetrates our awareness of things while at the same time offering the possibility of reprieve from complete enmeshment (submergence) in the form of existential reflection on the things, events, doings, goings-on, etc., that collectively constitute the phenomenological concept of world. By phenomenological reflection I refer to written analyses (texts) that approach mundane lifeworld phenomena in a manner or style that seeks to show or reveal aspects of the lifeworld that in the ordinary course of everyday life remain hidden from view…aspects of the lifeworld that while they may be glimpsed fleetingly from time to time, remain largely hidden, i.e. in a state of unrealized concealment. The article thus takes seriously the Husserlian call for a return “to the things themselves.” And while the ostensible topic is an old (or older) used car, the defacto topic is “us,” or perhaps better stated, the actual topic arises at the meeting place where the “us” (as subject) and “an older car” (as object) arrive and conjoin. It is at the place of this meeting between self and world that the phenomenological analysis can begin. The article emphasizes the practical import of this meeting, this engagement—it is not regarded as a matter of purely abstract philosophical theorizing nor as a purely descriptive (empirical) matter, although it is also that in part too.
Highlights
In today’s world, could there be anything more mundane, more ordinary, less deserving of time and philosophical attention than an older, no-longer-new, used car? On its face this might seem a rather odd topic for a philosophically based research paper—more appropriate for a do-ityourself YouTube video than an academic philosophy journal
Unless and until we encounter a breakdown of some kind— things change
The vast number of cars and vehicles we encounter on the roads each day are met with complete indifference; so long as they follow the accepted “rules of the road” they are there
Summary
In today’s world, could there be anything more mundane, more ordinary, less deserving of time and philosophical attention than an older, no-longer-new, used car? On its face this might seem a rather odd topic for a philosophically based research paper—more appropriate for a do-ityourself YouTube video than an academic philosophy journal. The vast number of cars and vehicles we encounter on the roads each day are met with complete indifference; so long as they follow the accepted “rules of the road” they are there. They take up physical space, but occupy no imaginative inner or reflective space. Heidegger (1994) speaks of a “distress” that accompanies the shift, the cracking open, the opening-up He asks new and different questions about what he calls the “basic questions” of philosophy; he reaches deep into the question of what it means to “do” philosophy; he touches disdainfully on what he calls the time-honoured, “selected problems” of “logic.” The scare-quotes are his. This is the immediate and the longer-term upshot of the “what ?”
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.