Abstract

The practice of enforcing the law on criminal goods as evidence of crimes in criminal proceedings is not in line with the objective of the law itself, namely obtaining proportional truth. Confiscation of the possession of movable or immovable, tangible or intangible objects is carried out for the purposes of proof in investigation, prosecution and trial.Thus, it implies the guarantee of confiscated goods, so that the confiscated goods are often used by investigators for other purposes which are not in accordance with the law. , which results in when the confiscated goods are needed to prove before a court session, the goods are not there, insufficient, not the same and so on prior to confiscation. On the basis of the thoughts described above, the authors are interested in examining and examining more deeply and analyzing this problem in research.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call