Abstract

Using a new dataset on firms privatized in the Czech Republic from 1993 to 1996, we show that, even after controlling for size and structure, voucher-privatized joint stock companies perform worse than firms with concentrated shareholdings that had to be purchased for cash, i.e., limited liability companies and foreign joint stock companies. We argue that static asset stripping, or tunneling in Czech parlance, was combined with dynamic looting of the Akerlof and Romer (1993) type because these same joint stock companies had privileged access to soft credit from state controlled banks. Although we do not have direct evidence of looting, we show that liabilities increased at a much faster rate in joint stock companies than in limited liability companies. J. Comp. Econ., March 2002, 30(1), pp. 1–24. World Bank, Washington, DC. © 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: L2, G3, K4.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.