Abstract

Studies comparing overwinter field losses of NO 3-N and denitrification potential using laboratory methods were conducted on the dominant soil Great Groups in Alberta. Recovery in spring of 15N-labelled NO 3-N incorporated into the 0–15 cm depth during winter was lower in the Solod, Black and Gray Luvisolic soils in northern and central Alberta (3–30%) compared to the Dark Brown, Brown and Thin Black soils in southern Alberta (68–95%). The northern and central Alberta sites retained a melting snowpack as thawing of top soil began. Nitrate loss was measured in the laboratory on the 0–15 cm samples from 8 soils amended with 150mg N kg −1 as KNO 3. After 7 days incubation, losses ranged from 62 to 90 mg of added NO 3-N kg −1 (i.e. 8.9–12.9 mg N kg −1 d −1). In an additional experiment, cumulative emissions of N 2O ranged from 19 to 58 mg N kg −1 after 48 h incubation (i.e. 9.5–29.5 mg N kg −1 d −1). A Brown, Black and Gray Luvisol soil amended with 100mg N kg −1 as KNO 3 was used to compare two laboratory methods of measuring denitrification potential. Nitrate loss after 3 days ranged from 53 to 60 mg N kg −1 using a method developed in our laboratory compared to 2–17 mg N kg −1 using a published method. The laboratory losses of NO 3-N did not correlate with losses in the field. These findings suggest that denitrification in the field was controlled by climatic rather than inherent soil chemical or biological variables.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call