Abstract
The success of most of the proposed energy recovery linac (ERL) based electron accelerator projects for future storage ring replacements (SRR) and high power IR--free-electron lasers (FELs) largely depends on the development of an appropriate source. For example, to meet the FEL specifications [J. W. Lewellen, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 5534, 22 (2004)] electron beams with an unprecedented combination of high brightness, low emittance ($0.1\text{ }\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{mrad}$), and high average current (hundreds of mA) are required. An elegant way to create a beam of such quality is to combine the high beam quality of a normal conducting rf photoinjector with the superconducting technology, i.e., to build a superconducting rf photoinjector (SRF gun). SRF gun R programs based on different approaches have been launched at a growing number of institutes and companies (AES, Beijing University, BESSY, BNL, DESY, FZD, TJNAF, Niowave, NPS, Wisconsin University). Substantial progress was achieved in recent years and the first long term operation was demonstrated at FZD [R. Xiang et al., in Proceedings of the 31st International Free Electron Laser Conference (FEL 09), Liverpool, UK (STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington, 2009), p. 488]. In the near future SRF guns are expected to play an important role for linac-driven FEL facilities. In this paper we will review the concepts, the design parameters, and the status of the major SRF gun projects.
Highlights
Today there are basically three different types of photoinjectors: the DC photoinjector (DC gun), the normal conducting rf photoinjector (NCRF gun), and the superconducting rf photoinjector (SRF gun).DC guns provide continuous wave (CW) electron beams, but both the low electric field strength at the cathode surface and the short accelerating gap limit the beam quality and the maximum extractable bunch charge [1]
Their low duty cycle can limit the performance when used in superconducting accelerators
Impurities on the niobium surface generated by the laser irradiation or by ion back bombardment of the cathode may result into a degradation of the cavity performance
Summary
Today there are basically three different types of photoinjectors: the DC photoinjector (DC gun), the normal conducting rf photoinjector (NCRF gun), and the superconducting rf photoinjector (SRF gun). Impurities on the niobium surface generated by the laser irradiation or by ion back bombardment of the cathode may result into a degradation of the cavity performance This problem, is partly mitigated by the high quality cryogenic vacuum in these guns. The QE determines the maximum extractable bunch charge Both the amount of impurities produced in the cavity and the quantum efficiency depend on the cathode material (or a respective cathode layer material covering the cathode spot of the niobium cell). There is a trade-off between the two properties of the cathode material, since most potential cathode materials which are well suited as cathodes from the point of view of impurities have low quantum efficiency (e.g. Cu, Nb) and vice versa (e.g. Cs2Te, GaAs, CsK2Sb) For this reason, different SRF gun projects apply different approaches to find an optimum. Details on available lasers and present cathode development are given elsewhere [7]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.