Abstract
While many standardized assessment measures exist to track child mental health treatment outcomes, the degree to which such tools have been adequately tested for reliability and validity across race, ethnicity, and class is uneven. This paper examines the corpus of published tests of psychometric properties for the ten standardized measures used in U.S. child outpatient care, with focus on breadth of testing across these domains. Our goal is to assist care providers, researchers, and legislators in understanding how cultural mismatch impacts measurement accuracy and how to select tools appropriate to the characteristics of their client populations. We also highlight avenues of needed research for measures that are in common use. The list of measures was compiled from (1) U.S. state Department of Mental Health websites; (2) a survey of California county behavioral health agency directors; and (3) exploratory literature scans of published research. Ten measures met inclusion criteria; for each one a systematic review of psychometrics literature was conducted. Diversity of participant research samples was examined as well as differences in reliability and validity by gender, race or ethnicity, and socio-economic class. All measures showed adequate reliability and validity, however half lacked diverse testing across all three domains and all lacked testing with Asian American/Pacific Islander and Native American children. ASEBA, PSC, and SDQ had the broadest testing.
Highlights
Reducing disparities in the access to, and quality of, child mental health care has long been identified as a national priority area (Perou et al, 2013; US Department of Health and Human Services et al, 2000)
Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) appeared in 8 articles to test Child Behavior Check List (CBCL), Ohio, and Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC)
All except Youth Outcome Questionnaire (Y-OQ) have some testing with minority (African American or Latino) families, as well as with low income or working-class families
Summary
Reducing disparities in the access to, and quality of, child mental health care has long been identified as a national priority area (Perou et al, 2013; US Department of Health and Human Services et al, 2000). California legislated a mandate in 2011 to develop a performance outcome system for children (SB 1009; California Legislative Analyst’s Office, 2011), the state’s development of data infrastructures to monitor quality and detect disparities have considerably lagged behind national recommendations (Gardner & Kelleher, 2017; Glied et al, 2015; Patel et al, 2015; Pincus, 2012; Zima et al, 2013). Results are divided into two sections: first the analyses of individual measures, an aggregate analysis of the entire corpus for systematic patterns and gaps
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
