Abstract

In the reporting period (1 February - 30 June 2020), there were five noteworthy cases in the field of social security. Two cases originated in French courts and concerned E 101 certificates. The Vueling case concerned the conditions for disregarding fraudulent E 101 certificates. Bouygues travaux publics dealt with the effects of E 101 certificates on obligations at the crossroads of social security and labour law. In Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v CW, the issue concerned whether a Member State of origin, Austria, must grant a rehabilitation allowance to a national no longer working or residing there. Caisse d’assurance retraite et de la santé au travail d’Alsace-Moselle v SJ related to the obligation for the competent institution to take into account an allowance paid by another Member State for raising a disabled child when calculating an insurance period for entitlement to an old-age pension. Finally, Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants v FV was a case about access to family benefits by a frontier worker for a child living in the same household but with whom there was no blood relationship.

Highlights

  • In the reporting period (1 February - 30 June 2020), there were five noteworthy cases in the field of social security

  • Around 75 cabin and flight crew members were posted from Spain to the Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport, relying on E 101 certificates

  • The case in which questions were referred to the Court of Justice concerned the civil proceedings that ran parallel to the criminal proceedings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the reporting period (1 February - 30 June 2020), there were five noteworthy cases in the field of social security.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call