Abstract

The ASDEX Upgrade (AUG) programme, jointly run with the EUROfusion MST1 task force, continues to significantly enhance the physics base of ITER and DEMO. Here, the full tungsten wall is a key asset for extrapolating to future devices. The high overall heating power, flexible heating mix and comprehensive diagnostic set allows studies ranging from mimicking the scrape-off-layer and divertor conditions of ITER and DEMO at high density to fully non-inductive operation (q95 = 5.5, ) at low density. Higher installed electron cyclotron resonance heating power 6 MW, new diagnostics and improved analysis techniques have further enhanced the capabilities of AUG.Stable high-density H-modes with MW m−1 with fully detached strike-points have been demonstrated. The ballooning instability close to the separatrix has been identified as a potential cause leading to the H-mode density limit and is also found to play an important role for the access to small edge-localized modes (ELMs). Density limit disruptions have been successfully avoided using a path-oriented approach to disruption handling and progress has been made in understanding the dissipation and avoidance of runaway electron beams. ELM suppression with resonant magnetic perturbations is now routinely achieved reaching transiently . This gives new insight into the field penetration physics, in particular with respect to plasma flows. Modelling agrees well with plasma response measurements and a helically localised ballooning structure observed prior to the ELM is evidence for the changed edge stability due to the magnetic perturbations. The impact of 3D perturbations on heat load patterns and fast-ion losses have been further elaborated.Progress has also been made in understanding the ELM cycle itself. Here, new fast measurements of and Er allow for inter ELM transport analysis confirming that Er is dominated by the diamagnetic term even for fast timescales. New analysis techniques allow detailed comparison of the ELM crash and are in good agreement with nonlinear MHD modelling. The observation of accelerated ions during the ELM crash can be seen as evidence for the reconnection during the ELM. As type-I ELMs (even mitigated) are likely not a viable operational regime in DEMO studies of ‘natural’ no ELM regimes have been extended. Stable I-modes up to have been characterised using -feedback.Core physics has been advanced by more detailed characterisation of the turbulence with new measurements such as the eddy tilt angle—measured for the first time—or the cross-phase angle of and fluctuations. These new data put strong constraints on gyro-kinetic turbulence modelling. In addition, carefully executed studies in different main species (H, D and He) and with different heating mixes highlight the importance of the collisional energy exchange for interpreting energy confinement. A new regime with a hollow profile now gives access to regimes mimicking aspects of burning plasma conditions and lead to nonlinear interactions of energetic particle modes despite the sub-Alfvénic beam energy. This will help to validate the fast-ion codes for predicting ITER and DEMO.

Highlights

  • Introduction and technical improvementsThe ASDEX Upgrade (AUG) tokamak is the only medium sized ( Rgeo = 1.65 m, a = 0.5 m, Bt 3.2 T, Ip 1.4 MA, δ 0.5, κ 1.8) D shaped tokamak with a full metal—mainly tungsten (W)—wall [1]

  • The high overall heating power, flexible heating mix and comprehensive diagnostic set allows studies ranging from mimicking the scrape-off-layer and divertor conditions of ITER and DEMO at high density to fully noninductive operation (q95 = 5.5, βN 2.8) at low density

  • The comparison between the results from ion cyclotron range of frequency heating (ICRF) modulation experiments and the GKW predictions reveal that while the diffusivity of B is reasonably well reproduced under most conditions (figure 19(a)), the observed outward convection in conditions of dominant neutral beam injection (NBI) heating is not reproduced by the modelling, which predicts an impurity pinch for both dominant ion and electron heating (figure 19(b))

Read more

Summary

Meyer2 for the AUG Team

D. Aguiam3, C. Angioni1, C.G. Albert1,41, N. Arden1, R. Arredondo Parra1, O. Asunta4, M. de Baar5, M. Balden1, V. Bandaru1, K. Behler1, A. Bergmann1, J. Bernardo3, M. Bernert1, A. Biancalani1, R. Bilato1, G. Birkenmeier1,6, T.C. Blanken48, V. Bobkov1, A. Bock1, T. Bolzonella7, A. Bortolon31, B. Böswirth1, C. Bottereau8, A. Bottino1, H. van den Brand5, S. Brezinsek9, D. Brida1,6, F. Brochard10, C. Bruhn1,6, J. Buchanan2, A. Buhler1, A. Burckhart1, Y. Camenen49, D. Carlton1, M. Carr2, D. Carralero1,44, C. Castaldo53, M. Cavedon1, C. Cazzaniga7, S. Ceccuzzi53, C. Challis2, A. Chankin1, S. Chapman47, C. Cianfarani53, F. Clairet8, S. Coda12, R. Coelho3, J.W. Coenen9, L. Colas8, G.D. Conway1, S. Costea13, D.P. Coster1, T.B. Cote39, A. Creely38, G. Croci11, G. Cseh14, A. Czarnecka15, I. Cziegler29, O. D’Arcangelo53, P. David1, C. Day16, R. Delogu11, P. de Marné1, S.S. Denk1,6, P. Denner9, M. Dibon1, A. Di Siena1, D. Douai8, A. Drenik1, R. Drube1, M. Dunne1, B.P. Duval12, R. Dux1, T. Eich1, S. Elgeti1, K. Engelhardt1, B. Erdös14, I. Erofeev1, B. Esposito53, E. Fable1, M. Faitsch1, U. Fantz1, H. Faugel1, I. Faust1, F. Felici12, J. Ferreira3, S. Fietz1, A. Figuereido3, R. Fischer1, O. Ford54, L. Frassinetti17, S. Freethy1,2,38, M. Fröschle1, G. Fuchert54, J.C. Fuchs1, H. Fünfgelder1, K. Galazka15, J. Galdon-Quiroga1,19, A. Gallo8, Y. Gao9, S. Garavaglia11, A. Garcia-Carrasco17, M. Garcia-Muñoz19, B. Geiger54, L. Giannone1, L. Gil3, E. Giovannozzi53, C. Gleason-González16, S. Glöggler1,6, M. Gobbin7, T. Görler1, I. Gomez Ortiz1, J. Gonzalez Martin19, T. Goodman12, G. Gorini52, D. Gradic54, A. Gräter1, G. Granucci11, H. Greuner1, M. Griener1,6, M. Groth4, A. Gude1, S. Günter1, L. Guimarais3, G. Haas1, A.H. Hakola20, C. Ham2, T. Happel1, N. den Harder1, G.F. Harrer21, J. Harrison2, V. Hauer16, T. Hayward-Schneider1, C.C. Hegna39, B. Heinemann1, S. Heinzel22, T. Hellsten18, S. Henderson2, P. Hennequin23, A. Herrmann1, M.F. Heyn41, E. Heyn24, F. Hitzler1,6, J. Hobirk1, K. Höfler1, M. Hölzl1, T. Höschen1, J.H. Holm25, C. Hopf1, W.A. Hornsby1, L. Horvath26, A. Houben10, A. Huber9, V. Igochine1, T. Ilkei14, I. Ivanova-Stanik15, W. Jacob1, A.S. Jacobsen1, F. Janky1, A. Jansen van Vuuren54, A. Jardin43, F. Jaulmes5,40, F. Jenko1, T. Jensen25, E. Joffrin8, C.-P. Käsemann1, A. Kallenbach1, S. Kálvin14, M. Kantor5, A. Kappatou1, O. Kardaun1, J. Karhunen5, S. Kasilov41,42, Y. Kazakov28, W. Kernbichler41, A. Kirk2, S. Kjer Hansen1,25, V. Klevarova27, G. Kocsis14, A. Köhn1, M. Koubiti49, K. Krieger1, A. Krivska28, A. Krämer-Flecken9, O. Kudlacek1, T. KurkiSuonio4, B. Kurzan1, B. Labit12, K. Lackner1, F. Laggner21,31, P.T. Lang1, P. Lauber1, A. Lebschy1,6, N. Leuthold1, M. Li1, O. Linder1, B. Lipschultz29, F. Liu51, Y. Liu2,18, A. Lohs1, Z. Lu1, T. Luda di Cortemiglia1, N.C. Luhmann30, R. Lunsford31, T. Lunt1, A. Lyssoivan28, T. Maceina1, J. Madsen25, Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

Meyer for the ASDEX Upgrade and EUROfusion MST1 Teams
Introduction and technical improvements
Divertor and edge
No ELM regimes and 3D perturbations
Scenarios and heating
Core fast-ion physics
Transport
Findings
Summary and outlook

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.