Abstract

Examination of a person who has been a victim of a physical or sexual assault may be very important for upcoming legal proceedings. In the context of a clinical forensic examination, physical findings are recorded and biological trace material is gathered and secured. Ideally, all forensic findings are documented in a detailed report combined with photographic documentation, which employs a forensic scale to depict the size of the injuries. However, the integrity of such forensic findings depends particularly on two factors. First, the examination needs to be conducted professionally to ensure that the findings are properly admissible as court evidence. Second, the examination should take place as soon as possible because the opportunity to successfully secure biological samples declines rapidly with time. Access to low-threshold clinical forensic examinations is not evenly provided in all member states of the European Union (EU); in some states, they are not available at all. As part of the JUSTeU! (Juridical standards for clinical forensic examinations of victims of violence in Europe) project, the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Clinical Forensic Imaging in Graz, Austria created (in cooperation with its international partner consortium) a questionnaire: the purpose was to collect information about support for victims of physical and/or sexual assault in obtaining a low-threshold clinical forensic examination in various countries of the EU. Our paper provides a summary of the responses and an overview of the current situation concerning provided clinical forensic services.

Highlights

  • In November 2016, the European Commission published a Special Eurobarometer Report on genderbased violence [1]: the aim was to assess the perception of citizens in the 28 member states of the European Union (EU) on the topic

  • The responses obtained from the QCFN questionnaire, which was developed within the JUSTeU! project, provided a first insight into the current situation about clinical forensic services in the EU

  • The data from Part I of the QCFN indicated that clinical forensic examinations are of great relevance for victim support

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In November 2016, the European Commission published a Special Eurobarometer Report on genderbased violence [1]: the aim was to assess the perception of citizens in the 28 member states of the European Union (EU) on the topic. Questions concerning the availability of clinical forensic service offers were addressed: Questionnaire concerning national victim supporting low-threshold clinical forensic examination offers (QCFN) Both questionnaires were drafted by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Clinical Forensic Imaging and revised by all project partners. 12 of the 13 countries offered clinical forensic examinations (Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia). These countries were Austria, Germany, Italy, Ireland, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal and Slovenia. The disadvantages of special training concern time and cost factors: training is rather time consuming and expensive because it needs to be undertaken regularly to ensure a consistent quality level

Part II: clinical forensic examination routine
Findings
Conclusions and outlook
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call