Abstract

The effects of low-dose radiation are being increasingly investigated in biological, epidemiological, and clinical studies. Many recent studies have indicated the beneficial effects of low doses of radiation, whereas some studies have suggested harmful effects even at low doses. This review article introduces various studies reporting both the beneficial and harmful effects of low-dose radiation, with a critique on the extent to which respective studies are reliable. Epidemiological studies are inherently associated with large biases, and it should be evaluated whether the observed differences are due to radiation or other confounding factors. On the other hand, well-controlled laboratory studies may be more appropriate to evaluate the effects of low-dose radiation. Since the number of such laboratory studies is steadily increasing, it will be concluded in the near future whether low-dose radiation is harmful or beneficial and whether the linear-no-threshold (LNT) theory is appropriate. Many recent biological studies have suggested the induction of biopositive responses such as increases in immunity and antioxidants by low-dose radiation. Based on recent as well as classical studies, the LNT theory may be out of date, and low-dose radiation may have beneficial effects depending on the conditions; otherwise, it may have no effects.

Highlights

  • Radiation exposure at high-dose levels is considered to be harmful and it increases the incidence of cancer

  • Some consider radiation exposure below 200 mSv to be hazardous based on the linear-no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis, whereas others consider low-dose exposure to have beneficial effects, known as radiation hormesis and the radioadaptive response [1,2,3,4,5]

  • This review article introduced some of the biological studies that suggested the beneficial effects of low-dose radiation, but more emphasis was placed on studies that suggested bionegative and harmful effects of radiation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radiation exposure at high-dose levels (usually > 100 or 200 mSv for humans) is considered to be harmful and it increases the incidence of cancer. Some consider radiation exposure below 200 mSv to be hazardous based on the linear-no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis, whereas others consider low-dose exposure to have beneficial effects, known as radiation hormesis and the radioadaptive response [1,2,3,4,5]. Epidemiological studies inherently contain many large biases, and the results must be interpreted much more cautiously, with special attention to the confounding factors In this context, prospective studies on humans may be optimal to investigate the issue of low-dose radiation effects, a large-scale study is not easy to conduct. Since the issue is closely related to whether the LNT hypothesis is true, let us start with the LNT hypothesis

LNT Hypothesis
Hormesis as a Universal Phenomenon
Overview
Radioadaptive Response
Growth Promotion and Lifespan Elongation by Low-Dose Radiation
Cancer Incidence in Atomic Bomb Survivors
Effects of Radiation from Computed Tomography
Randomized Human Studies on the Effects of Low-Dose-Radiation-Emitting Mats
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call