Abstract

To investigate overused laboratory test of haemoglobin Ac1 (HbA1c) in one medicine centre in southern Taiwan. Data were extracted from the database of the Medical Center from March 2013 to March 2015. These patients were classified into five groups, including group A (diabetic patients with HbA1c value ≥7), group B (healthy people with HbA1c value ≥7), group C (diabetic patients with HbA1c test value <7), group D (healthy people with HbA1c value <6.5) and group E (prediabetic people with HbA1c value 6.5-7). The divisions requested for HbA1c test were divided into four categories, including endocrinology, internal medicine, surgery and the others. Repeat testing at the time of the second test was investigated using survival analysis. The percentage of overall inappropriate repeat testing was as high as 34%. The percentages among the five patient groups were relatively different. Group C had the largest percentage of inappropriate repeat testing (48%) and group A had the second largest (30%), followed by groups D (25%), E (13%) and B (10%). The percentages of inappropriate repeat testing of the five patient groups were also relatively different among the four categories of division, with Kaplan-Meier curves showing significant differences. The time to repeat testing was the shortest for group A and was the second shortest for group C, followed by groups B, E and D. The results provided detailed information about the percentages of inappropriate repeat testing of HbA1c of the five patient groups among the four categories of division.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call