Abstract

PurposeWe propose a novel method to assess overbeaming and overranging, as well as the effect of reducing longitudinal exposure range, by using a dynamic z‐collimator in area detector computed tomography.Methods and materialsA 500‐mm diameter cylindrical imaging plate was exposed by helical scanning in a dark room. The beam collimation of the helical acquisitions was set at 32 and 80 mm. Overbeaming and overranging with the dynamic z‐collimator were measured.ResultsThe actual beam widths were approximately 39 and 88 mm at 32 and 80 mm collimation, respectively, and were relatively reduced owing to increased beam collimation. Overranging was 27.0 and 48.2 mm with a pitch of 0.83 and 1.49 at 32 mm collimation and 72.5 and 83.1 mm with a pitch of 0.87 and 0.99 at 80 mm collimation. The dynamic z‐collimator relatively reduced the overranging by 17.3% and 17.1% for the 32 and 80 mm collimation, respectively.ConclusionWe devised a method to simultaneously measure overbeaming and overranging with only one helical acquisition. Although the dynamic z‐collimator reduced the overranging by approximately 17%, wider collimation widths and higher pitch settings would increase the exposure dose outside the scan range.

Highlights

  • Advances in multirow detector computed tomography (MDCT) have made high‐speed scanning an easy operation to perform

  • In area detector computed tomography (CT), volume helical scanning can be performed with a beam width (BW) set up to 80 mm in the z‐direction with current scanners.[1]

  • Overranging showed the smallest value at 32 mm collimation and the largest value at 80 mm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Advances in multirow detector computed tomography (MDCT) have made high‐speed scanning an easy operation to perform. The longitudinal x‐ray fluence of MDCT contains the penumbra, called overbeaming, for homogenizing the x‐ray intensity incident on the detector.[2] Considering that the influence of overbeaming in. Overbeaming relatively decreases owing to the increased detector row,[3,4] overbeaming in recent volume helical scanning has not necessarily been clarified

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.