Abstract
The new estimate of Rh (represented by red lines) in Ciais et al (2020) is generally far smaller than that from the Trendy (16 out of 17) and the MsTMIP (8 out of 12) models as well as the ensemble means of all models (represented by blue dashed lines). The overestimated Rh in global land-carbon cycle models could possibly give rise to inaccurate simulations of soil carbon turnover, and the global land-atmospheric carbon exchange.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
