Abstract

Simulations are progressively becoming an everyday tool for the understanding of materials. DFT is without any doubt the working horse in the vast majority of cases in which quantum mechanical effects need to be included for a correct description of the chemical problem. However, unlike other quantum-mechanical methods, DFT approaches cannot be improved in a systematic manner. This leads to distrust and the feeling that calculation parameters can be tuned with the explicit aim of matching the experimental results, even at the expense of the quality of the simulation. More specifically, it would appear that changing the functional can provide any desired quantity to match the experiment. Hereby, we focus on the nature of systematic simulation errors as compared to reproducibility–experimental ones. We show that DFT errors need to be estimated from bracketing physical descriptions. Highlighting the role of the main error affecting DFT calculations, the delocalization error, we show that HF and LDA provide b...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.