Abstract

The paper discusses the potential of assistive service robots to support disabled and elderly people. It shows that they have considerable untapped potential in this area, but also that inappropriate implementations could increase isolation, reduce independence and lead to users feeling as though they are under surveillance. The main body of the paper presents an overview of existing applications and discusses their benefits and potential problems. This is organized by an extension of the common classification into socially and physically assistive robots by the two categories of sensory assistive and mixed assistance robots. Another more detailed classification is also presented. This discussion is introduced by an overview of many of the technological components of smart mobile robots. It is followed by a discussion of user acceptance. The problems of existing models based on either solely positive or solely negative factors are noted and a model containing both types of factors is proposed. The need for continuing research is noted and various proposals are made.

Highlights

  • Robots have considerable potential to support elderly and disabled people

  • The discussion of assistive robots was structured by organization into the four categories of: (i) physically assistive robots; (ii) socially assistive robots; (iii) sensory assistive robots: and (iv) mixed assistance robots

  • The discussion of different types of assistive robots was introduced by an overview of some of the underlying technologies used in assistive robots

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Robots have considerable potential to support elderly and disabled people. this potential does not seem to have been realized in practice. Only 159 assistive robots for disabled and elderly people were sold worldwide in 2012 (http://www.ifr.org/service-robots/ statistics). This is likely to be an underestimate, as a number of the systems in use are non-commercially available prototypes that do not appear in the statistics. Assistive robots differ from indus‐ trial robots in a number of ways Their users are ordinary disabled and/or older people without speci‐ alized training, making it important that the interface is easy to use and that the robot is designed to be fully accessible and usable by the intended user groups. The impor‐ tance of considering user needs has been noted [8]

Classification of Assistive Service Robots
Mixed assistance robots
Design Issues
Physical Structure and Appearance
Mobile platforms
Legged Robots
Autonomy and Shared Control
Human-Robot Interaction
Architectures for Intelligent Robot Control Systems
Smart Houses
Robotic Wheelchairs
Robotic Manipulators
Mobility Devices for Blind People
Shopping Assistance Robots
Companion and Socially Assistive Robots
Robots for Autistic Children
Robotic Assistants for Elderly People
User Acceptance of Robots
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call