Abstract

e20577 Background: Previous studies have investigated overall survival (OS) among small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with data through 2015. Using data through mid-2019, this study strives to make the body of studies more current, and to provide more recent data on the baseline characteristics and OS of treated SCLC patients, stratified by stage at diagnosis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified adult patients with confirmed SCLC between January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2018 that initiated anti-cancer treatment using real-world data from electronic medical records (ConcertAI, including data from CancerLinQ, an initiative of the American Society of Clinical Oncology). Exclusion criteria included evidence of other primary cancer at baseline, no initial stage recorded, death prior to diagnosis, or participation in a clinical trial. Patients entered the cohort upon receipt of their first anti-cancer treatment after SCLC diagnosis and were assigned up to three progression intervals to assess overall survival for each progression-based line of therapy. Patients were followed until death, end of data, or end of the study period (June 30, 2019). Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted to assess median survival time as estimated by the survival curve. Results: Characteristics among the 82 limited stage (LS) and 217 extensive stage (ES) patients at 1L treatment were similar; however, LS patients were slightly older (mean age: LS = 67.5, ES = 66.4), and ES patients had a higher comorbidity score given their metastatic disease status (mean score: LS = 3.9, ES = 7.3). Both groups had very similar ECOG performance scores prior to 1L (ECOG: 0-1 ≅ 40%, 2+ ≅ 25%, Missing ≅ 35%). For the 299 patients that began 1L treatment (LS = 82, ES = 217), median OS time was 8.41 months (LS = 12.35 months, ES = 7.98 months). For the 124 of the 299 patients who progressed and were treated with 2L therapy, median OS time was 4.30 months. For the 44 of the 124 patients that progressed and were treated with 3L therapy, median OS time was 3.88 months. Of the 299 treated patients, 216 died before the end of the study period, representing 57% of the LS patients and 78% of the ES patients. Conclusions: These results reveal a difference in OS between LS and ES patients treated in 1L. The short survival time in patients with later lines of therapy highlights the need for new treatments in 2L and 3L.[Table: see text]

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call