Overall survival of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have PTEN tumor suppressor gene loss of function.

Abstract

58 Background: It is estimated that more than 40% of patients with mCRPC have functional loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) tumor suppressor gene, which is associated with unfavorable prognosis and reduced response to androgen receptor-targeting therapy. We describe patient characteristics and survival outcomes by PTEN LOF status among patients with mCRPC in real-world clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the nationwide Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine mCRPC Clinico-Genomic database (FH-FMI CGDB), a de-identified database linking data derived from electronic health records with genomic data derived from FMI comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests. The study included patients ≥18 years old, with a primary diagnosis of mCRPC between 1/1/2013 and 6/30/2019 who underwent FMI CGP testing and who had a valid PTEN LOF status. Patients were included if their PTEN report date and mCRPC diagnosis date occurred before death or censoring. PTEN LOF status was identified via FMI’s CGP testing. Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods assessed overall survival (OS) by PTEN LOF status from the date of mCRPC diagnosis (later of metastasis and castration resistance) until death or end of study follow-up. A stratified Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard of death. The Cox model was adjusted for age, race and sequence of metastasis/CRPC diagnoses, and was stratified by the year of mCRPC diagnosis. Adjustments to account for left-truncation and survivorship bias were made in the KM analysis and the Cox regression model. Results: Among the 458 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 174 (38%) had PTEN LOF. The majority of the study sample (76%) was diagnosed with castration-resistance after metastasis. The PTEN LOF group had a higher percentage of white patients (80% vs. 68%; p= 0.01) compared to the PTEN non-LOF group. The mean age of the study sample was 68 years, and there was no difference in mean age at diagnosis by PTEN LOF status ( p= 0.17). Based on the KM estimates adjusted for left-truncation, the median OS was 14.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.1-19.7) in the PTEN LOF group compared to 18.3 months (95%CI: 15.5-21.5) in the PTEN non-LOF group (log-rank p= 0.049). In the multivariable Cox model, the PTEN LOF group had numerically 30% higher risk of death compared to the PTEN non-LOF group (hazard ratio = 1.30; 95% CI: 0.99-1.71; p= 0.057). Conclusions: Among real-world patients with mCRPC in the CGDB, PTEN LOF could be associated with poorer survival outcomes, potentially highlighting the unmet need among these patients. Additional studies with larger cohorts are needed to better evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with PTEN LOF. Therapeutic agents acting on the PTEN/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway are being tested in clinical trials, and could potentially improve outcomes in this subgroup of patients with mCRPC.