Abstract

Maize originated as a tropical plant that required short days to transition from vegetative to reproductive development. ZmCCT10 [CO, CONSTANS, CO-LIKE and TIMING OF CAB1 (CCT) transcription factor family] is a regulator of photoperiod response and was identified as a major QTL controlling photoperiod sensitivity in maize. We modulated expression of ZmCCT10 in transgenic maize using two constitutive promoters with different expression levels. Transgenic plants over expressing ZmCCT10 with either promoter were delayed in their transition from vegetative to reproductive development but were not affected in their switch from juvenile-to-adult vegetative growth. Strikingly, transgenic plants containing the stronger expressing construct had a prolonged period of vegetative growth accompanied with dramatic modifications to plant architecture that impacted both vegetative and reproductive traits. These plants did not produce ears, but tassels were heavily branched. In more than half of the transgenic plants, tassels were converted into a branched leafy structure resembling phyllody, often composed of vegetative plantlets. Analysis of expression modules controlling the floral transition and meristem identity linked these networks to photoperiod dependent regulation, whereas phase change modules appeared to be photoperiod independent. Results from this study clarified the influence of the photoperiod pathway on vegetative and reproductive development and allowed for the fine-tuning of the maize flowering time model.

Highlights

  • Plants display an astonishing diversity in body plan architecture [1]

  • The Banana Streak Virus promoter (BSVpro) exceeds the level of expression driven by the ubiquitin promoter (UBIpro) and directs expression in all tissue tested with exception of pollen [60]

  • We examined the TFL1-like ZCN1/3 genes which are antagonists of FLOWERING locus T (FT)-like genes and have been shown to delay flowering and modify plant architecture when over-expressed in maize plants [54]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plants display an astonishing diversity in body plan architecture [1]. Much of the complexity of plant morphology can be explained by variations of the basic architectural unit– the phytomer. The number of phytomers is determined by the activity of the shoot apical meristem (SAM), or the apical bud, which contains a pool of undifferentiated pluripotent stem cells capable of producing the above ground organs [2]. The axillary bud is composed of meristematic cells which initiate the growth of side branches [3]. The SAM represses the outgrowth of the axillary bud to control the extent of branching which is known as apical dominance [4]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call