Abstract

BRAF is a cytoplasmic protein kinase, which activates the MEK-ERK signalling pathway. Deregulation of the pathway is associated with the presence of BRAF mutations in human cancer, the most common being V600EBRAF, although structural rearrangements, which remove N-terminal regulatory sequences, have also been reported. RAF-MEK-ERK signalling is normally thought to occur in the cytoplasm of the cell. However, in an investigation of BRAF localisation using fluorescence microscopy combined with subcellular fractionation of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)-tagged proteins expressed in NIH3T3 cells, surprisingly, we detected N-terminally truncated BRAF (ΔBRAF) in both nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. In contrast, ΔCRAF and full-length, wild-type BRAF (WTBRAF) were detected at lower levels in the nucleus while full-length V600EBRAF was virtually excluded from this compartment. Similar results were obtained using ΔBRAF tagged with the hormone-binding domain of the oestrogen receptor (hbER) and with the KIAA1549-ΔBRAF translocation mutant found in human pilocytic astrocytomas. Here we show that GFP-ΔBRAF nuclear translocation does not involve a canonical Nuclear Localisation Signal (NLS), but is suppressed by N-terminal sequences. Nuclear GFP-ΔBRAF retains MEK/ERK activating potential and is associated with the accumulation of phosphorylated MEK and ERK in the nucleus. In contrast, full-length GFP-WTBRAF and GFP-V600EBRAF are associated with the accumulation of phosphorylated ERK but not phosphorylated MEK in the nucleus. These data have implications for cancers bearing single nucleotide variants or N-terminal deleted structural variants of BRAF.

Highlights

  • There are three members of the mammalian RAF protein kinase family: ARAF, BRAF and CRAF

  • A weak immunofluorescence signal was detected in BrafÀ/À cells with the same antibody, whereas no signal was seen with the secondary antibody alone (Fig. S1)

  • We found a significant difference in the compartmentalisation of detected N-terminally truncated BRAF (DBRAF):ER compared to DCRAF:ER following 4-HT treatment (Fig. 2B), with DBRAF:ER having significantly more N > C cells (w38% compared to 0%) and N1⁄4C cells (w57% compared to w8%) than DCRAF:ER with N < C cells reducing as a consequence (w5% compared to w92%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There are three members of the mammalian RAF protein kinase family: ARAF, BRAF and CRAF. Oncogenic forms of the RAFs, encoding only their C-terminal kinase domains, were originally identified as transforming genes in oncogenic retroviruses of mice and chickens [1]. RAF proteins share three conserved regions (CR) 1e3, with CR3 encoding the kinase domains in the C-termini. This region is the most homologous amongst the three RAFs, showing >75% identity [2], and its activity is suppressed by the N-terminus [3]. As mentioned, this is evident in the form of N-terminal truncations, which generate oncoproteins with transforming activity. N-terminal truncations of RAF are rare in human cancers, chromosomal translocations that delete the N-terminal regulatory domain of BRAF have been reported in multiple cancer types [7, 8] as well as aberrant spliced BRAF variants that

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.