Abstract

BackgroundRemote management is partially replacing routine follow-up in patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Although it reduces clinical staff time compared with standard in-office follow-up, a new definition of roles and responsibilities may be needed to review remote transmissions in an effective, efficient, and timely manner. Whether remote triage may be outsourced to an external remote monitoring center (ERMC) is still unclear.ObjectiveThe aim of this health care quality improvement project was to evaluate the feasibility of outsourcing remote triage to an ERMC to improve patient care and health care resource utilization.MethodsPatients (N=153) with implanted CIEDs were followed up for 8 months. An ERMC composed of nurses and physicians reviewed remote transmissions daily following a specific remote monitoring (RM) protocol. A 6-month benchmarking phase where patients’ transmissions were managed directly by hospital staff was evaluated as a term of comparison.ResultsA total of 654 transmissions were recorded in the RM system and managed by the ERMC team within 2 working days, showing a significant time reduction compared with standard RM management (100% vs 11%, respectively, within 2 days; P<.001). A total of 84.3% (551/654) of the transmissions did not include a prioritized event and did not require escalation to the hospital clinician. High priority was assigned to 2.3% (15/654) of transmissions, which were communicated to the hospital team by email within 1 working day. Nonurgent device status events occurred in 88 cases and were communicated to the hospital within 2 working days. Of these, 11% (10/88) were followed by a hospitalization.ConclusionsThe outsourcing of RM management to an ERMC safely provides efficacy and efficiency gains in patients’ care compared with a standard in-hospital management. Moreover, the externalization of RM management could be a key tool for saving dedicated staff and facility time with possible positive economic impact.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01007474; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01007474

Highlights

  • Remote monitoring (RM) management of patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) enables early detection of clinically relevant events and complications while partially replacing routine follow-up [1,2,3,4,5]

  • A total of 654 transmissions were recorded in the RM system and managed by the external remote monitoring center (ERMC) team within 2 working days, showing a significant time reduction compared with standard RM management (100% vs 11%, respectively, within 2 days; P

  • From April 2016 to December 2016, an ERMC composed of 1 trained nurse and 1 supporting physician (HTN Spa, Brescia, Italy) performed daily reviews of remote transmissions from 153 CIED patients implanted in the hospital, S Raffaele Giglio Hospital of Cefalù (Italy): 62 single- or dual chamber pacemakers (IPGs), 15 single- or dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and 76 cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Remote monitoring (RM) management of patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) enables early detection of clinically relevant events and complications while partially replacing routine follow-up [1,2,3,4,5]. RM can reduce clinical staff time compared with standard in-office follow-up [13,14,15], organizational workflow changes and a new definition of roles and responsibilities may be needed to review remote transmissions in an effective, efficient, and timely manner [16]. Remote management is partially replacing routine follow-up in patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). It reduces clinical staff time compared with standard in-office follow-up, a new definition of roles and responsibilities may be needed to review remote transmissions in an effective, efficient, and timely manner. Whether remote triage may be outsourced to an external remote monitoring center (ERMC) is still unclear

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call