Outlook on sponge reproduction science in the last ten years: are we far from where we should be?

Abstract

To comprehend the state of the art of sponge reproduction science (SRS), we quantified and analyzed the trends in SRS in the last decade, aiming to answer three questions: (i) Were there fewer SRS works presented during the last sponge conference? (ii) Did the number of SRS publications decline in the last decade? (iii) Does the number of abstracts at sponge conferences influence overall SRS publications? In addition, we checked whether the SRS community has answered Ereskovsky’s ‘five important questions’, enabling us to advance SRS enough to be considered as a fourth period of this scientific field. We found that SRS was less represented at the last sponge conference, despite an increase in the number of publications during the last decade. Moreover, the number of abstracts presented at sponge conferences contributed to a small portion (25%) of the published works in this area during the last decade. In addition, we found that two of the five Ereskovsky’s questions are still mostly not answered. Thus, we conclude that SRS is healthy and advancing steadily, especially in some subareas (e.g. developmental biology and life history). There are still much to advance, but this is still a strong field of biological science research.