Abstract
Shewhart control charts with estimated control limits are widely used in practice. However, the estimated control limits are often affected by phase-I estimation errors. These estimation errors arise due to variation in the practitioner’s choice of sample size as well as the presence of outlying errors in phase-I. The unnecessary variation, due to outlying errors, disturbs the control limits implying a less efficient control chart in phase-II. In this study, we propose models based on Tukey and median absolute deviation outlier detectors for detecting the errors in phase-I. These two outlier detection models are as efficient and robust as they are distribution free. Using the Monte-Carlo simulation method, we study the estimation effect via the proposed outlier detection models on the Shewhart chart in the normal as well as non-normal environments. The performance evaluation is done through studying the run length properties namely average run length and standard deviation run length. The findings of the study show that the proposed design structures are more stable in the presence of outlier detectors and require less phase-I observation to stabilize the run-length properties. Finally, we implement the findings of the current study in the semiconductor manufacturing industry, where a real dataset is extracted from a photolithography process.
Highlights
The two salient tools of statistical process control (SPC) are memory and memory-less control charts
Through the simulation results of the algorithm in Section observe variability that appears in the Shewhart control chart dueexplained to different choices2.2, of we sample sizethe m, variabilitypractitioners
We evaluate the performance of the Shewhart control chart for location monitoring
Summary
The two salient tools of statistical process control (SPC) are memory and memory-less control charts. The memory-less control charts are most suitable for large shift, while the memory-control charts are used to monitor moderate and small shifts. Control charts-irrespective of the magnitude they measure-operate in two phases: phase-I, the prospective stage from which the control limits are obtained; phase-II, where we monitor the process and correct the unnatural causes of variation whenever they occur (cf [1]). In phase-I we estimate the control limits using the parameters of the process under study which, in reality, are seldom known. The amount of data employed in phase-I for estimating process parameters varies from one practitioner to the other. As a result, this variability affects the chart performance in the monitoring stage i.e., phase-II. This variability affects the chart performance in the monitoring stage i.e., phase-II. (see for example [2,3,4,5,6])
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.