Abstract
The Australian experience with Italian, Greek and Chinese raises a serious question about the usefulness of the distinction between 'native' and 'non-native' competence. The question is particularly acute when it is necessary, in the interests of equity and effective pedagogy, to assign learners from heterogeneous linguistic backgrounds to different language programmes, whether they be for first, second or foreign languages. The paper discusses some of the conceptual problems underlying distinctions between the terms 'native' and 'non-native' speaker, between 'foreign' and 'second' language learners, and the related difficulty of eliciting valid and reliable data about language background. The problems are illustrated with reference to a scheme developed in Australia involving the classification of learners into categories of 'advantaged' and 'disadvantaged' for the purpose of determining who is deserving of special consideration in the university selection process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.