Abstract

Introduction: The treatment landscape of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has advanced significantly with the approval of combination regimens containing an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for patients with treatment-naïve disease. Little information is available regarding the activity of single-agent ICIs for patients with previously untreated mRCC not enrolled in clinical trials.Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort included consecutive treatment-naïve mRCC patients from six institutions in the United States who received ≥1 dose of an ICI outside a clinical trial, between June 2017 and October 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze outcomes including objective best response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and tolerability.Results: The final analysis included 27 patients, 70% men, median age 64 years (range 42–92), 67% Caucasian, and 33% with ECOG 2 or 3 at baseline. Most patients had intermediate risk (85%, IMDC) with clear cell (56%), papillary (26%), unclassified (11%), chromophobe (4%), and translocation (4%) RCC. All patients had evidence of metastatic disease involving the lungs (59%), lymph node (41%), CNS (19%), liver (11%), adrenal gland (11%), and bone (11%). The median time on ICI was 3.1 (0.1–26.8) months, and the median PFS was 6.3 (95% CI, 0–18.6) months. Among the 21 patients with an evaluable response, the best ORR was 33%, including two complete responses and five partial responses. The ORR was 29% (n = 1 complete response, n = 5 partial response) in clear cell and 5% (n = 1 complete response) in non-clear cell RCC. Adverse events (AEs) of any cause were reported in 37% and included fatigue (11%), dermatitis (11%), diarrhea (7%), and shortness of breath (7%). Significant AEs (30%) included shortness of breath (7%), acute kidney injury (4%), dermatitis (4%), Clostridium difficile infection (4%), cerebrovascular accident (4%), and fatigue (7%). Three patients discontinued therapy due to grade 4 AEs.Conclusions: In this multi-institutional case series, single-agent ICI demonstrated objective responses and was well tolerated in a heterogeneous treatment-naïve mRCC cohort. ICI monotherapy is not the standard of care for patients with mRCC, and further investigation is necessary to explore predictive biomarkers for optimal treatment selection in this setting.

Highlights

  • The treatment landscape of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has advanced significantly with the approval of combination regimens containing an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for patients with treatment-naïve disease

  • Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common form of kidney cancer, and the overall prognosis is poor for patients who present with metastatic RCC [1, 2]

  • After the approval of the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab for previously treated metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients based on the phase 3 CheckMate025 study [3], combination regimens that include an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) targeting progressive disease (PD)-1, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic Tlymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have been investigated in treatment-naïve mRCC, in large phase 3 trials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The treatment landscape of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has advanced significantly with the approval of combination regimens containing an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for patients with treatment-naïve disease. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab has an established role in the treatment of intermediate- and poor-risk patients (CheckMate 214), and different combinations of ICIs with angiogenic therapies such as axitinib with pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-426) and axitinib with avelumab (Javelin 101), among others, have shown significant activity in patients with mRCC [4,5,6,7]. While these combinations offer a significant clinical improvement vs sunitinib in the frontline space, adverse events (AEs) are observed in most cases and treatment interruptions, dose reductions, and permanent discontinuation are not uncommon

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call