Abstract
ObjectiveCongenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) encompasses a diverse morphologic cohort, for which multiple treatment pathways exist. Understanding surgical outcomes among various pathways and their determinants are challenged by limited sample size and follow-up, and heterogeneity. We sought to investigate these questions with a large cohort of ccTGA patients presenting at different ages and representing the full therapeutic spectrum. MethodsRetrospective review of 240 patients diagnosed with ccTGA from Cleveland Clinic coupled with prospective cross-sectional follow-up. Forty-six patients whose definitive procedure was completed elsewhere were excluded. Time-related survival was described among treatment pathways using actuarial, time-varying covariate, and competing risks analyses. Temporal trends in longitudinal valve and ventricular function were assessed using nonlinear mixed-effects models. ResultsMedian follow-up was 10 years. Seventy-nine patients with ccTGA underwent anatomic repair, 45 physiologic repair, 24 Fontan palliation, and 6 primary transplant. Forty patients managed expectantly had excellent long-term survival when considered from time of presentation, but benefited from failures captured following transition to physiologic repair or transplant. Morphologic right ventricular dysfunction after physiologic repair increased from 68% to 85% after 5 years, whereas morphologic left ventricular function was stable in anatomic repair, especially with early surgery. Transplant-free survival at 15 years for anatomic and physiologic repair was 80% and 71%, respectively. ConclusionsEarly anatomic repair may be preferable to physiologic repair for select ccTGA patients. Late attrition after physiologic repair represents failure of expectant management and progressive tricuspid valve and morphologic right ventricular dysfunction compared with anatomic repair, where morphologic left ventricular function is relatively preserved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.