Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background</h3> Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) has become an alternative to surgical pulmonary valve placement (SPVR) for patients after tetralogy of Fallot repair. This study compared the outcomes of TPVR with those of SPVR. <h3>Methods</h3> We reviewed data from patients who underwent pulmonary valve replacement with a median of 2 years of follow-up. <h3>Results</h3> Between 2010 and 2021, 215 patients underwent pulmonary valve replacement (72 TPVR and 143 SPVR). The median size of the right ventricular end-diastolic volume index in the TPVR group was 165 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (IQR, 136-190) and 184 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (IQR, 163-230) in the SPVR group (<i>P</i> = .001). The median value of the maximum landing zone at the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) in patients with native RVOT was 26 mm (IQR, 24-28) in the 43 patients in the TPVR group and 31 mm (IQR, 28-34) in the 101 patients in the SPVR group (<i>P</i> < .001). The median size of the pulmonary valve implant for the native RVOT in the TPVR group was 29.0 mm (IQR, 26.0-29.0) and 24.0 mm (IQR, 24.0-24.0) in the SPVR group (<i>P</i> < .001). There were no deaths in the TPVR group and 8 deaths in the SPVR group (<i>P</i> = .041). Major complications and the length of hospitalization were lower in the TPVR group (<i>P</i> = .001). After 2 years, the mean decrease in QRS duration was 5 milliseconds (IQR, 1-14) in the TPVR group and 1 millisecond (IQR, −4 to 10) in the SPVR group (<i>P</i> = .006). <h3>Conclusions</h3> TPVR allows for larger implants, resulting in lower mortality, shorter hospital stays, and fewer major cardiac events. SPVR may be preferable in patients with larger (>30 mm) native RVOT and in those who require concomitant surgical procedures.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call