Outcomes of the facelift incisional approach to neck dissection without endoscopic or robotic assistance

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Objective</h3> : The facelift incisional approach to neck dissection offers several advantages including improved cosmesis, increased patient satisfaction, and decreased morbidity. This approach has been previously described using robotic or endoscopic instrumentation, but the clinical outcomes of this approach using standard instrumentation have not been reported. The objective of this study was to determine if the facelift incisional approach to neck dissection can be performed without endoscopic or robotic assistance and achieve improved oncologic and cosmetic outcomes. <h3>Study Design</h3> : Retrospective cohort study over 4 years. <h3>Setting</h3> : A national comprehensive cancer center. <h3>Methods</h3> <b>:</b> 104 subjects received 113 oncologic neck dissections, of which 35 were performed using a facelift approach. Primary outcomes included rate of negative margins, recurrence, incidence of nerve weakness, and incidence of lymphedema. <h3>Results</h3> : The mean age of the cohort was 60.1 ± 12.7 years and 72.6% were male. Mean follow up was 23.1 ± 19.1 months (p=0.21). 104 subjects (92.9%) had negative margins on final pathology, with no difference between approaches (88.2% vs 94.9% respectively, p=0.24). 34 subjects (97.1%) in the facelift group had no evidence of disease at study conclusion. There was no difference in marginal mandibular nerve weakness (p=0.10) nor shoulder weakness (p=0.59) between groups. There was no difference between post-operative lymphedema (38.2% vs 29.2% for the facelift vs standard incision groups, p=0.35). <h3>Conclusion</h3> : A facelift approach to neck dissection using standard instrumentation without robotic or endoscopic assistance achieves acceptable clinical and oncologic outcomes compared to the standard incisional approach with an additional benefit of improved cosmesis.