Outcomes of subsequent abdominal operations after an initial ventral hernia repair

William S Cobb,Brittany Kothari,Emily Mcgill,Jeremy A Warren,Anna Hayden,Alfredo M Carbonell,Samantha Worth,Dawn Blackhurst,Weston Keller

doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.044

William S Cobb, Brittany Kothari + Show 7 more

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.044

Copy DOI

Abstract

IntroductionNearly 20% of ventral hernia repair (VHR) patients require a subsequent abdominal operation (SAO), and mesh position may impact the complexity and outcome of the SAO. MethodsRetrospective review of VHR with mesh from 2006 to 2020 from an internal database and the ACHQC. Primary outcomes measured incidence, complexity, and complications of SAO relative to mesh position. ResultsSAO was required in 433 of 2539 (17.1%) patients, totaling 671 operations; 197/893 (22.1%) with intraperitoneal mesh (IPM) and 236/1646 (14.3%) with extraperitoneal mesh (EPM; p < 0.001). SAO was directly related to VHR in 180 (232 total SAOs) and unrelated in 253 (439 total SAOs). There were no significant differences in complications after SAO between IPM and EPM, nor any difference in adhesion complexity. ConclusionIncidence of SAO is higher with IPM, but surgical outcomes are similar. Due to the risk of secondary mesh infection with IPM, significantly more of these were removed at the time of SAO.

Full Text