Outcomes of Subdural Versus Subperiosteal Drain After Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Abstract

Although the use of a postoperative drain after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is known to improve surgical outcomes, the superiority of subdural over subperiosteal drains has not been firmly established. Evidence comparing these 2 drain types is largely restricted to single-center series with limited numbers. Using a multicenter cohort study, we aimed to show noninferiority of subperiosteal drains vis-à-vis subdural drains after burr-hole evacuation of CSDH. We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with CSDH aged 21 years and older who had undergone burr-hole craniostomy across 3 tertiary hospitals from 2010 to 2017. Primary outcome measures included CSDH recurrence and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 6 months. Outcomes of patients in the subdural and subperiosteal drain groups were analyzed and confounders were adjusted for using multivariate logistic regression. Of the 570 cases analyzed, 329 (57.7%) received a subdural drain and 241 (42.3%) received a subperiosteal drain. There was no significant difference between the 2 drain groups in CSDH recurrence (13.1% in the subdural group vs. 11.2% in the subperiosteal group; P= 0.502) or 6-month mRS score (27.2% with mRS 4-6 in the subdural group vs. 20.4% in the subperiosteal group; P= 0.188). Independent predictors of CSDH recurrence identified on multivariate analysis included premorbid mRS score 0-3 (P= 0.021), separated CSDH type on preoperative computed tomography scan (P= 0.002), and postoperative pneumocephalus of ≥15 mm (P= 0.005). Outcomes of subdural and subperiosteal drains after burr-hole craniostomy for CSDH are largely equivalent based on our findings.