Abstract

BackgroundThere is little descriptive data on Stenotrophomonas maltophilia hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critically ill patients. The optimal modalities of antimicrobial therapy remain to be determined. Our objective was to describe the epidemiology and prognostic factors associated with S. maltophilia pneumonia, focusing on antimicrobial therapy.MethodsThis nationwide retrospective study included all patients admitted to 25 French mixed intensive care units between 2012 and 2017 with hospital-acquired S. maltophilia HAP during intensive care unit stay. Primary endpoint was time to in-hospital death. Secondary endpoints included microbiologic effectiveness and antimicrobial therapeutic modalities such as delay to appropriate antimicrobial treatment, mono versus combination therapy, and duration of antimicrobial therapy.ResultsOf the 282 patients included, 84% were intubated at S. maltophilia HAP diagnosis for duration of 11 [5–18] days. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score II was 47 [36–63], and the in-hospital mortality was 49.7%. Underlying chronic pulmonary comorbidities were present in 14.1% of cases. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was considered effective on S. maltophilia according to susceptibility patterns in only 30% of cases. Delay to appropriate antimicrobial treatment had, however, no significant impact on the primary endpoint. Survival analysis did not show any benefit from combination antimicrobial therapy (HR = 1.27, 95%CI [0.88; 1.83], p = 0.20) or prolonged antimicrobial therapy for more than 7 days (HR = 1.06, 95%CI [0.6; 1.86], p = 0.84). No differences were noted in in-hospital death irrespective of an appropriate and timely empiric antimicrobial therapy between mono- versus polymicrobial S. maltophilia HAP (p = 0.273). The duration of ventilation prior to S. maltophilia HAP diagnosis and ICU length of stay were shorter in patients with monomicrobial S. maltophilia HAP (p = 0.031 and p = 0.034 respectively).ConclusionsS. maltophilia HAP occurred in severe, long-stay intensive care patients who mainly required prolonged invasive ventilation. Empirical antimicrobial therapy was barely effective while antimicrobial treatment modalities had no significant impact on hospital survival.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03506191

Highlights

  • There is little descriptive data on Stenotrophomonas maltophilia hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critically ill patients

  • Previous studies identified several risk factors for developing S. maltophilia HAP in critically ill patients, such as prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization associated with invasive procedures, extended periods of mechanical ventilation, or exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics [3,4,5]

  • Population Of the 102,316 patients admitted to the 25 ICUs within the study period, 282 (0.27%) with a S. maltophilia pneumonia were included (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is little descriptive data on Stenotrophomonas maltophilia hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critically ill patients. Our objective was to describe the epidemiology and prognostic factors associated with S. maltophilia pneumonia, focusing on antimicrobial therapy. Previous studies identified several risk factors for developing S. maltophilia HAP in critically ill patients, such as prolonged ICU hospitalization associated with invasive procedures, extended periods of mechanical ventilation, or exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics [3,4,5]. S. maltophilia pneumonia occurs preferentially in patients with the poorest prognosis [6, 7]. These studies were conducted from heterogeneous and small cohorts of patients. Data are lacking to draw recommendations on the optimal therapeutic strategies against S. maltophilia pneumonia

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call