Outcomes of renal function and efficacy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer treated by tislelizumab-based immunochemotherapy.

Abstract

e16608 Background: The occurrence PD-1 ICIs brings a new era of treatment for bladder cancer (BC). Although the safety and efficacy of most PD-1 ICIs have been certified progressively, whether they can be used in patients (pts) with renal impairment is always a concern for clinicians. Consequently, we intend to investigate the variation of renal function and efficacy of PD-1 ICIs based immunochemotherapy for pts with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and renal insufficiency in short term. Methods: Our study relied on population of the TRUCE-01 trial (NCT04730219), an open-label, single-arm phase II study of tislelizumab based immunochemotherapy in pts with MIBC. Data of pts, including demographic information, imaging and pathological assessment of efficacy, and serum creatinine (SCr) level in baseline, after the first, second and third cycle (C1, C2 and C3) of treatment was collected and analyzed retrospectively. We calculated at estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) according to CKD-EPI formula 2009, and divided pts into different groups according to baseline eGFR, in reference to CKD categories in the K-DIGO 2012 guidelines. Results: 74 pts have been included in our research in total. The median age was 69.5 years (IQR 61.7-75.0) and 56 (75.7%) were male. Median SCr in baseline was 77.4umol/L (IQR 67.8-96.6), while median eGFR was 84.6 (IQR 63.6-94.0) (the unit of eGFR is mL/min/1.73 m2). At baseline, 25 pts were classified as G1 (eGFR≥90), 36 as G2(eGFR <90 and≥60), 12 as G3 (eGFR <60 and ≥30), and 1 as G4 (eGFR <30 and≥15). No significant difference was found in eGFR between pts with CKD G1-2 in comparison to baseline and after C1, C2, C3 of treatment (All p>0.05). In pts with CKD G3-4, it is notable that eGFR may improve when the C1, C2 and C3 completed, in comparison to the baseline (p=0.087, p=0.046, p=0.114 in Wilcoxson test, p=0.082 in Repeated Measures ANOVA). 48 (64.9%) pts received 3 cycles of ICIs and underwent an operation. 24 of 48 (50%) pts received radical cystectomy (RC) and others were treated by maximal TURBT. All of them have conducted efficacy evaluation by both radiographic test and pathology. It is noted that no statistical difference in outcomes between Group G1-2 and G3-4 (p=0.772). Conclusions: Despite renal impairment is common in pts with MIBC, PD-1 immunotherapy is generally safe for kidney of MIBC patients with renal insufficiency and have no influence on efficacy in the short term. The potential improvement in eGFR of patients with worse renal function and its mechanism is essential to be revealed and verified. [Table: see text]