Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. INTRODUCTION Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a poorly defined entity with heterogeneous prognosis. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) is one of the main predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, outcomes of LVNC patients with preserved LVEF (pEF) remain uncertain. PURPOSE The aim of our study was to determine the incidence and predictors of MACE in LVNC patients with pEF as well as to assess the evolution of LVEF throughout follow-up. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal, multicentre cohort study. Consecutive patients with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and/or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) diagnostic criteria for LVNC and initially pEF (LVEF≥50%) were recruited. MACE were defined as a composite of heart failure (HF), ventricular arrhythmias (VA), systemic embolisms (SE) and/or all-cause mortality. Progressive systolic dysfunction was defined as an LVEF < 50% at last TTE and/or an absolute ≥10-point decrease in LVEF from first to last TTE. Lower limit of LVEF CMR values were considered 50-57% according to current recommendations. Cox-regression analysis was used for MACE and logistic regression was used for progressive systolic dysfunction (only first and last TTE were available). RESULTS A total of 305 patients from 12 centres were included from 2000 to 2018. Age was 38 ± 19 years and 165 (54%) were men. LVEF was 62 ± 8% and 8% had late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). During a median follow-up of 4.7 (IQR 2.1-7.4) years, MACE occurred in 40 (13%) patients with an incidence rate of 2.73 (95% CI 2.00-3.72) events per 100 person-years: 8 HF, 27 VA, 3 SE and 5 deaths. LVEF by CMR (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99, p = 0.0048) and hypertension (HR 2.30, 95% CI 1.08-4.89, p = 0.031) were the only variables independently associated with the endpoint. Patients with lower limit LVEF values showed an increased risk of MACE (Figure 1). LGE was not associated. Sixty-one (21%) patients experienced progressive systolic dysfunction: 31 (11%) had an LVEF < 50% and 48 (17%) an absolute ≥10-point decrease in LVEF at last follow-up. On multivariate analysis, LVEF by CMR was the only independent predictor (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, p = 0.008). Patients with lower limit LVEF values had an increased risk (Figure 2). In this subgroup, LGE was also associated with the endpoint (HR 10.69, 95% CI 1.97-58.13, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Patients with left ventricular noncompaction and preserved ejection fraction carry a moderate risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and progressive systolic dysfunction. LVEF remains the main predictor of outcomes in this subgroup. Patients with lower limit LVEF values are at increased risk, probably suggesting subclinical systolic dysfunction. Therefore, they should be carefully monitored. Abstract Figure. Kaplan Meier cuves for MACE Abstract Figure. Risk of progressive systolic dysfunction

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call