Outcomes of endovascular treatment for stenosis occurring after cephalic vein transposition and graft interposition

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the outcome of endovascular treatment after surgical treatment for cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) in the brachiocephalic fistula (BCF) and to analyze the factors influencing patency. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing cephalic vein transposition (CVT) or graft interposition (GIP) for CAS from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. A total of 73 patients with restenosis were included in this study. Patients were classified into cephalic transposition (BCF-CVT) (n = 49) and graft interposition (BCF-GIP) (n = 24) groups. We calculated the postintervention primary and secondary patency of endovascular treatment by using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and analyzed variables associated with loss of postintervention patency. ResultsSix-month and 12-month postintervention primary patency rates of endovascular treatment for restenosis were 56.7% and 15.6% and secondary patency rates were 89.7% and 72.1%, respectively. In the BCF-CVT group, 6-month and 12-month postintervention primary patency was 56.8% and 17.6% and secondary patency was 93.3% and 79.4%, respectively. In the BCF-GIP group, 6-month and 12-month postintervention primary patency was 56.5% and 8.7% and secondary patency was 85.7% and 56.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in postintervention primary patency between the two groups (P = .79). However, the BCF-CVT group demonstrated higher postintervention secondary patency (P = .034). The BCF-GIP group had a higher number of stenosis sites (P < .01). There was no significant predictor of reduced postintervention primary patency. The only adverse variable of postintervention secondary patency was BCF-GIP (hazard ratio, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.06-9.34; P < .05). ConclusionsEndovascular treatment is still the acceptable option for stenosis occurring after surgical treatment for CAS. CVT provides higher postintervention secondary patency than GIP.