Abstract

Background:Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) is now becoming the popular form of endothelial keratoplasty using only donor DM with healthy endothelium as true component lamellar corneal surgery.Objective:To analyze the results of visual outcomes, endothelial cell loss and complications of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in first consecutive 100 Indian eyes.Methods:100 eyes of 95 consecutive patients with endothelial dysfunctions of different etiologies scheduled for DMEK, were included in this study. In each case, surgeon prepared tissue using McCarey Kaufman medium- or Cornisol-preserved donor cornea with a cell count of ≥2500 cells/mm2. Surgical complications, Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA); Endothelial Cell Density (ECD) and Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) were analyzed for each patient after a minimum follow-up of three months.Results:The Main indication was pseudophakic corneal edema or bullous keratopathy in 52 (52%) eyes. 38 (38%) eyes had Fuchs′ dystrophy with various grades of cataract. In 43 phakic eyes, DMEK was combined with cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation. Mean DM-roll preparation time was 7.5 ± 2.8 min and in 3 eyes, DM-graft were damaged. After 3-months, BSCVA was ≥20/25 in 57 (57.6%) cases. Mean ECD was 2123 ± 438/mm2 (range: 976 - 3208/ mm2) and the mean endothelial cell loss after 3-months was 26.92 ± 13.40 (range: 4.90 - 66.6%). Partial DM detachment occurred in 8 (8.0%) eyes and rebubbling required in 4 eyes. Iatrogenic primary graft failure occurred in one eye.Conclusion:Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty is a safe and effective procedure in several types of endothelial diseases among Indian patients with encouraging surgical and visual outcomes. Complications are less and endothelial cell loss percentage is acceptable.

Highlights

  • Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) is well established as the treatment of choice for corneal endothelial diseases, 1874-3641/18 2018 Bentham OpenDescemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Descemet's Membrane (DM)-Roll in ConsecutiveThe Open Ophthalmology Journal, 2018, Volume 12 135 like Pseudophakic Corneal Edema (PCE) or Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy (PBK) and Fuchs’ Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) [1]

  • DMEK was combined with cataract surgery, performed by phacoemulsification with implantation of hydrophobic acrylic posterior chamber intraocular lens (PE-PCIOL); the DMEK-triple

  • In all phakic eyes - DMEK was combined with PE-PCIOL simultaneously (DMEK-triple). 53 (53%) eyes had pseudophakic corneal edema or bullous keratopathy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) is well established as the treatment of choice for corneal endothelial diseases, 1874-3641/18 2018 Bentham OpenDescemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) DM-Roll in ConsecutiveThe Open Ophthalmology Journal, 2018, Volume 12 135 like Pseudophakic Corneal Edema (PCE) or Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy (PBK) and Fuchs’ Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD) [1]. DSAEK is not a true anatomic replacement surgery. In 2006, Melles et al performed a pure Descemet's Membrane (DM)-endothelium complex transplant which is a true anatomical replacement surgery and named it Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) [4]. This procedure has shown potentially better and faster visual outcomes than DSAEK, though the initial learning curve is much steeper and there is more Endothelial Cell Loss (ECL) due to more donor manipulation during surgery. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) is becoming the popular form of endothelial keratoplasty using only donor DM with healthy endothelium as true component lamellar corneal surgery

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call