Outcomes of Colectomy and Proctectomy According to Surgeon Training: General vs Colorectal Surgeons.

Abstract

Colectomies and proctectomies are commonly performed by both general surgeons (GS) and colorectal surgeons (CRS). The aim of our study was to examine the outcomes of elective colectomy, urgent colectomy, and elective proctectomy according to surgeon training. Data were obtained from the Vizient database for adults who underwent elective colectomy, urgent colectomy, and elective proctectomy from 2020-2022. Operations performed in the setting of trauma and patients within the database's highest relative expected mortality risk group were excluded. Outcomes were compared according to surgeon's specialty: GS vs. CRS. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was in-hospital complication rate. Data were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Of 149,516 elective colectomies, 75,711(50.6%) were performed by GS and 73,805(49.4%) by CRS. Compared to elective colectomies performed by CRS, elective colectomies performed by GS had higher rates of complications(4.9% vs. 3.9%, OR1.23, 95%CI 1.17-1.29,p<.01) and mortality(0.5% vs. 0.2%, OR2.06, 95%CI 1.72-2.47,p<.01). Of 71,718 urgent colectomies, 54,680(76.2%) were performed by GS, while 17,038(23.8%) were performed by CRS. Compared to urgent colectomies performed by CRS, urgent colectomies performed by GS were associated with higher rates of complications(12.1% vs. 10.4%, OR1.14, 95%CI 1.08-1.20,p<.01) and mortality (5.1% vs. 2.3%, OR2.08, 95%CI 1.93-2.23,p<.01). Of 43,749 elective proctectomies, 28,458(65.0%) were performed by CRS and 15,291(35.0%) by GS. Compared to proctectomies performed by CRS, those performed by GS were associated with higher rates of complications (5.3% vs. 4.4%, OR1.16, 95%CI 1.06-1.27,p<.01) and mortality(0.3% vs. 0.2%, OR1.49, 95%CI 1.02-2.20,p=.04). In this nationwide study, colectomies and proctectomies performed by CRS were associated with improved outcomes compared to GS. Hospitals without a CRS on staff should consider prioritizing recruiting CRS specialists.