Outcomes in high-risk pulmonary embolism patients undergoing FlowTriever mechanical thrombectomy: the FLAME study in perspective.

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and life-threatening acute cardiovascular problem. In some patients, an abrupt increase in right ventricular (RV) afterload and impaired gas exchange result in acute RV failure, hypoperfusion, and severe hypoxemia due to V/Q mismatch. State-of-the-art management of acute PE includes early detection, risk stratification based on clinical, imaging, and biomarker criteria, and multidisciplinary decision-making regarding therapy.1,2 The European Society of Cardiology guidelines for management of PE recommend selection of therapy based on clinical severity of the presentation with class I recommendations for anticoagulation and systemic thrombolysis in patients with high-risk PE and for surgical thrombectomy in such patients in whom thrombolysis is contraindicated or has failed.3 Catheter-directed interventions for acute PE are aimed at increasing the cross-sectional area of patent pulmonary vasculature, thereby lowering resistance and alleviating V/Q mismatch.1,2 Percutaneous catheter-directed treatments are recommended as a reasonable alternative (Class IIa) in patients for whom thrombolysis is contraindicated or has failed.